Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/igt_core.c: Flag the test as failing after a segfault

2015-05-19 Thread Morton, Derek J
I will take a look and submit a test as a separate patch. //Derek -Original Message- From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 4:14 PM To: Morton, Derek J Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wood, Thomas Subject: Re:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/igt_core.c: Flag the test as failing after a segfault

2015-05-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 02:37:31PM +0100, Derek Morton wrote: fatal_signal_handler() was trapping fatal errors but not flagging the test as failing or setting an exit code. The result was that the test would return Ok or Skipped depending on what the other subtests did even though one of the

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/igt_core.c: Flag the test as failing after a segfault

2015-05-18 Thread Derek Morton
fatal_signal_handler() was trapping fatal errors but not flagging the test as failing or setting an exit code. The result was that the test would return Ok or Skipped depending on what the other subtests did even though one of the subtests had segfaulted. Signed-off-by: Derek Morton