Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/chamelium: Let the Chamelium itself wait for a stable video input

2017-08-30 Thread Lyude Paul
On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 13:24 +0300, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 15:08 +0300, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 17:55 +0300, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > > > Before capturing video, the Chamelium will always wait for the > > > video > > > input to be stable (and

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/chamelium: Let the Chamelium itself wait for a stable video input

2017-08-30 Thread Paul Kocialkowski
On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 15:08 +0300, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 17:55 +0300, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > > Before capturing video, the Chamelium will always wait for the video > > input to be stable (and perform the FSM if it was not). This means > > that > > there is no need to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/chamelium: Let the Chamelium itself wait for a stable video input

2017-08-29 Thread Paul Kocialkowski
On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 17:55 +0300, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > Before capturing video, the Chamelium will always wait for the video > input to be stable (and perform the FSM if it was not). This means > that > there is no need to explicitly do it beforehand. > > When the receiver needs to be

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/chamelium: Let the Chamelium itself wait for a stable video input

2017-08-28 Thread Paul Kocialkowski
Before capturing video, the Chamelium will always wait for the video input to be stable (and perform the FSM if it was not). This means that there is no need to explicitly do it beforehand. When the receiver needs to be reset, the call will result in a timeout, after which the follow-up call to