Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_plane_lowres: Add DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET test

Op 08-03-17 om 14:45 schreef Mika Kahola: > On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 13:38 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Hey, >> >> Op 07-02-17 om 14:33 schreef Mika Kahola: >>> When doing a full atomic modeset, kernel should fail if the flag >>> DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET is not set. Let's add this test as

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_plane_lowres: Add DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET test

On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 13:38 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Hey, > > Op 07-02-17 om 14:33 schreef Mika Kahola: > > > > When doing a full atomic modeset, kernel should fail if the flag > > DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET is not set. Let's add this test as > > part of > > 'kms_plane_lowres'

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_plane_lowres: Add DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET test

Hey, Op 07-02-17 om 14:33 schreef Mika Kahola: > When doing a full atomic modeset, kernel should fail if the flag > DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET is not set. Let's add this test as part of > 'kms_plane_lowres' testset. The testcases are 'pipe-x-allow-modeset' where > x stands for pipe in

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_plane_lowres: Add DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET test

When doing a full atomic modeset, kernel should fail if the flag DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET is not set. Let's add this test as part of 'kms_plane_lowres' testset. The testcases are 'pipe-x-allow-modeset' where x stands for pipe in question. For: VIZ-6955 Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola