Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/pm_rc6_residency: Add subtest to check RC6 suspend handling

2017-04-25 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 02:55:23PM +0200, Ewelina Musial wrote: > In some cases we observed that forcewake isn't kept after > resume and then RC6 residency is not constant. This test only asks whether the debugfs/forcewake-user is kept across resume. What benefit does this have over the existing

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/pm_rc6_residency: Add subtest to check RC6 suspend handling

2017-04-25 Thread Michał Winiarski
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 02:55:23PM +0200, Ewelina Musial wrote: > In some cases we observed that forcewake isn't kept after > resume and then RC6 residency is not constant. > > References: HSD#1804921797 > Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler > Cc: Michal Winiarski

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/pm_rc6_residency: Add subtest to check RC6 suspend handling

2017-04-25 Thread Szwichtenberg, Radoslaw
On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 14:55 +0200, Ewelina Musial wrote: > In some cases we observed that forcewake isn't kept after > resume and then RC6 residency is not constant. > > References: HSD#1804921797 > Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler > Cc: Michal Winiarski

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/pm_rc6_residency: Add subtest to check RC6 suspend handling

2017-04-24 Thread Ewelina Musial
In some cases we observed that forcewake isn't kept after resume and then RC6 residency is not constant. References: HSD#1804921797 Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler Cc: Michal Winiarski Cc: Lukasz Fiedorowicz