On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:22:00AM +0200, Petri Latvala wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:23:33AM -0500, Sean Paul wrote:
> > Pretty simple test:
> > - initializes the output
> > - clears the content protection property
> > - verifies that it clears
> > - sets the content protection property to
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Ville Syrjälä
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:23:33AM -0500, Sean Paul wrote:
>> Pretty simple test:
>> - initializes the output
>> - clears the content protection property
>> - verifies that it clears
>> - sets the content
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:23:33AM -0500, Sean Paul wrote:
> Pretty simple test:
> - initializes the output
> - clears the content protection property
> - verifies that it clears
> - sets the content protection property to desired
> - verifies that it transitions to enabled
Can we get a chamelium
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 3:22 AM, Petri Latvala wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:23:33AM -0500, Sean Paul wrote:
>> Pretty simple test:
>> - initializes the output
>> - clears the content protection property
>> - verifies that it clears
>> - sets the content protection
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:23:33AM -0500, Sean Paul wrote:
> Pretty simple test:
> - initializes the output
> - clears the content protection property
> - verifies that it clears
> - sets the content protection property to desired
> - verifies that it transitions to enabled
>
> Does this for both
Pretty simple test:
- initializes the output
- clears the content protection property
- verifies that it clears
- sets the content protection property to desired
- verifies that it transitions to enabled
Does this for both legacy and atomic.
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul
---