Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] kms_content_protection: Add Content Protection test

2017-12-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:22:00AM +0200, Petri Latvala wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:23:33AM -0500, Sean Paul wrote: > > Pretty simple test: > > - initializes the output > > - clears the content protection property > > - verifies that it clears > > - sets the content protection property to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] kms_content_protection: Add Content Protection test

2017-12-05 Thread Sean Paul
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:23:33AM -0500, Sean Paul wrote: >> Pretty simple test: >> - initializes the output >> - clears the content protection property >> - verifies that it clears >> - sets the content

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] kms_content_protection: Add Content Protection test

2017-12-05 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:23:33AM -0500, Sean Paul wrote: > Pretty simple test: > - initializes the output > - clears the content protection property > - verifies that it clears > - sets the content protection property to desired > - verifies that it transitions to enabled Can we get a chamelium

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] kms_content_protection: Add Content Protection test

2017-12-05 Thread Sean Paul
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 3:22 AM, Petri Latvala wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:23:33AM -0500, Sean Paul wrote: >> Pretty simple test: >> - initializes the output >> - clears the content protection property >> - verifies that it clears >> - sets the content protection

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] kms_content_protection: Add Content Protection test

2017-12-05 Thread Petri Latvala
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:23:33AM -0500, Sean Paul wrote: > Pretty simple test: > - initializes the output > - clears the content protection property > - verifies that it clears > - sets the content protection property to desired > - verifies that it transitions to enabled > > Does this for both

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] kms_content_protection: Add Content Protection test

2017-12-04 Thread Sean Paul
Pretty simple test: - initializes the output - clears the content protection property - verifies that it clears - sets the content protection property to desired - verifies that it transitions to enabled Does this for both legacy and atomic. Signed-off-by: Sean Paul ---