On 05/03/18 03:03, Chris Wilson wrote:
It appears that waiting for a 100us period whereby we are unable to
submit another batch and proclaim the ring full, may have the false
positive where the scheduler intervenes and we are signalled twice
before having slept on ring space. Increasing the
It appears that waiting for a 100us period whereby we are unable to
submit another batch and proclaim the ring full, may have the false
positive where the scheduler intervenes and we are signalled twice
before having slept on ring space. Increasing the interval reduces the
likelihood of the
