Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt 2/2] tests/gem_exec_suspend: Add basic s4-devices subtest

2016-10-05 Thread Imre Deak
On ke, 2016-10-05 at 10:22 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 12:04:53PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > > Add a new subtest that performs suspend-to-disk, but instead of > > doing > > the full sequence it suspends/resumes only devices. A failed s4 > > subtest > > and a successful

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt 2/2] tests/gem_exec_suspend: Add basic s4-devices subtest

2016-10-05 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 12:04:53PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > Add a new subtest that performs suspend-to-disk, but instead of doing > the full sequence it suspends/resumes only devices. A failed s4 subtest > and a successful s4-devices subtest would indicate a kernel core or BIOS > problem as

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt 2/2] tests/gem_exec_suspend: Add basic s4-devices subtest

2016-10-05 Thread Imre Deak
Add a new subtest that performs suspend-to-disk, but instead of doing the full sequence it suspends/resumes only devices. A failed s4 subtest and a successful s4-devices subtest would indicate a kernel core or BIOS problem as opposed to some issue in the driver. Signed-off-by: Imre Deak