Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 1/6] drm/i915/guc: Rename guc_ggtt_offset to intel_guc_ggtt_offset

Quoting Jackie Li (2018-03-02 02:16:41) > GuC related exported functions should start with "intel_guc_" prefix and > pass intel_guc as the first parameter since its GuC related. Current > guc_ggtt_offset() failed to follow this code convention and this is a > problem for future patches that needs

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 1/6] drm/i915/guc: Rename guc_ggtt_offset to intel_guc_ggtt_offset

On 03/02/2018 12:04 AM, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote: Cc: Michal Wajdeczko Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble Cc: Chris Wilson Cc: Joonas Lahtinen Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 1/6] drm/i915/guc: Rename guc_ggtt_offset to intel_guc_ggtt_offset

On 3/2/2018 5:46 AM, Jackie Li wrote: GuC related exported functions should start with "intel_guc_" prefix and pass intel_guc as the first parameter since its GuC related. Current guc_ggtt_offset() failed to follow this code convention and this is a problem for future patches that needs to

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 1/6] drm/i915/guc: Rename guc_ggtt_offset to intel_guc_ggtt_offset

GuC related exported functions should start with "intel_guc_" prefix and pass intel_guc as the first parameter since its GuC related. Current guc_ggtt_offset() failed to follow this code convention and this is a problem for future patches that needs to access intel_guc data to verify the GGTT