Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 1/6] drm/i915/guc: Rename guc_ggtt_offset to intel_guc_ggtt_offset

2018-03-13 Thread Joonas Lahtinen 
Quoting Jackie Li (2018-03-02 02:16:41)
> GuC related exported functions should start with "intel_guc_" prefix and
> pass intel_guc as the first parameter since its GuC related. Current
> guc_ggtt_offset() failed to follow this code convention and this is a
> problem for future patches that needs to access intel_guc data to verify
> the GGTT offset against the GuC WOPCM top.
> 
> This patch renames the guc_ggtt_offset to intel_guc_ggtt_offset and updates
> the related code to pass intel_guc pointer to this function call, so that
> we can have a unified coding style for GuC code and also enable the future
> patches to get GuC related data from intel_guc to do the offset
> verification. Meanwhile, this patch also moves the GUC_GGTT_TOP from
> intel_guc_regs.h to intel_guc.h since it is not GuC register related
> definition.
> 
> v8:
>  - Fixed coding style issues and moved GUC_GGTT_TOP to intel_guc.h (Sagar)
>  - Updated commit message to explain to reason and motivation to add
>intel_guc as the first parameter of intel_guc_ggtt_offset (Chris)
> 
> v9:
>  - Fixed code alignment issue due to line break (Chris)
> 
> v10:
>  - Removed unnecessary comments, redundant code and avoided reuse variable
>to avoid potential issues (Joonas)
> 
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko 
> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble 
> Cc: Chris Wilson 
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen 
> Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble  (v8)
> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen  (v9)
> Signed-off-by: Jackie Li 
> Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko  (v11)

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen 

Regards, Joonas
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 1/6] drm/i915/guc: Rename guc_ggtt_offset to intel_guc_ggtt_offset

2018-03-05 Thread Yaodong Li 



On 03/02/2018 12:04 AM, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:


Cc: Michal Wajdeczko 
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble 
Cc: Chris Wilson 
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen 
Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble  (v8)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen  (v9)
Signed-off-by: Jackie Li 

I think maintainers will prefer as:
either

Cc:
Cc:
S-o-b:
R-b:

or

S-o-b:
Cc:
Cc:
R-b:
Thanks Sagar! I will include these changes along with other 
comments/suggestion

from Joonas (if any:-))

Regards,
-Jackie

___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 1/6] drm/i915/guc: Rename guc_ggtt_offset to intel_guc_ggtt_offset

2018-03-02 Thread Sagar Arun Kamble 



On 3/2/2018 5:46 AM, Jackie Li wrote:

GuC related exported functions should start with "intel_guc_" prefix and
pass intel_guc as the first parameter since its GuC related. Current
guc_ggtt_offset() failed to follow this code convention and this is a
problem for future patches that needs to access intel_guc data to verify
the GGTT offset against the GuC WOPCM top.

This patch renames the guc_ggtt_offset to intel_guc_ggtt_offset and updates
the related code to pass intel_guc pointer to this function call, so that
we can have a unified coding style for GuC code and also enable the future
patches to get GuC related data from intel_guc to do the offset
verification. Meanwhile, this patch also moves the GUC_GGTT_TOP from
intel_guc_regs.h to intel_guc.h since it is not GuC register related
definition.

v8:
  - Fixed coding style issues and moved GUC_GGTT_TOP to intel_guc.h (Sagar)
  - Updated commit message to explain to reason and motivation to add
intel_guc as the first parameter of intel_guc_ggtt_offset (Chris)

v9:
  - Fixed code alignment issue due to line break (Chris)

v10:
  - Removed unnecessary comments, redundant code and avoided reuse variable
to avoid potential issues (Joonas)

Cc: Michal Wajdeczko 
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble 
Cc: Chris Wilson 
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen 
Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble  (v8)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen  (v9)
Signed-off-by: Jackie Li 

I think maintainers will prefer as:
either

Cc:
Cc:
S-o-b:
R-b:

or

S-o-b:
Cc:
Cc:
R-b:

Similar for other patches.

Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko  (v11)
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c| 11 ++-
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h| 14 --
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_ads.c|  8 
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_ct.c |  5 +++--
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.c |  2 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c|  2 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_reg.h|  3 ---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c | 10 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c|  6 --
  9 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
index e6512cc..a788e15 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
@@ -269,8 +269,9 @@ void intel_guc_init_params(struct intel_guc *guc)
  
  	/* If GuC submission is enabled, set up additional parameters here */

if (USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv)) {
-   u32 ads = guc_ggtt_offset(guc->ads_vma) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-   u32 pgs = guc_ggtt_offset(dev_priv->guc.stage_desc_pool);
+   u32 ads = intel_guc_ggtt_offset(guc,
+   guc->ads_vma) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+   u32 pgs = intel_guc_ggtt_offset(guc, guc->stage_desc_pool);
u32 ctx_in_16 = GUC_MAX_STAGE_DESCRIPTORS / 16;
  
  		params[GUC_CTL_DEBUG] |= ads << GUC_ADS_ADDR_SHIFT;

@@ -418,7 +419,7 @@ int intel_guc_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
data[0] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_ENTER_S_STATE;
/* any value greater than GUC_POWER_D0 */
data[1] = GUC_POWER_D1;
-   data[2] = guc_ggtt_offset(guc->shared_data);
+   data[2] = intel_guc_ggtt_offset(guc, guc->shared_data);
  
  	return intel_guc_send(guc, data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));

  }
@@ -441,7 +442,7 @@ int intel_guc_reset_engine(struct intel_guc *guc,
data[3] = 0;
data[4] = 0;
data[5] = guc->execbuf_client->stage_id;
-   data[6] = guc_ggtt_offset(guc->shared_data);
+   data[6] = intel_guc_ggtt_offset(guc, guc->shared_data);
  
  	return intel_guc_send(guc, data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));

  }
@@ -463,7 +464,7 @@ int intel_guc_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
  
  	data[0] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_EXIT_S_STATE;

data[1] = GUC_POWER_D0;
-   data[2] = guc_ggtt_offset(guc->shared_data);
+   data[2] = intel_guc_ggtt_offset(guc, guc->shared_data);
  
  	return intel_guc_send(guc, data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));

  }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
index 52856a9..0c8b10a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
@@ -100,13 +100,23 @@ static inline void intel_guc_notify(struct intel_guc *guc)
guc->notify(guc);
  }
  
-/*

+/* GuC addresses above GUC_GGTT_TOP also don't map through the GTT */
+#define GUC_GGTT_TOP   0xFEE0
+
+/**
+ * intel_guc_ggtt_offset() - Get and validate the GGTT offset of @vma
+ * @guc: intel_guc structure.
+ * @vma: i915 graphics virtual memory area.
+ *
   * GuC does not allow any gfx GGTT address that falls into range [0, 
WOPCM_TOP),
   * which is reserved for Boot ROM, SRAM and WOPCM.

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 1/6] drm/i915/guc: Rename guc_ggtt_offset to intel_guc_ggtt_offset

2018-03-01 Thread Jackie Li 
GuC related exported functions should start with "intel_guc_" prefix and
pass intel_guc as the first parameter since its GuC related. Current
guc_ggtt_offset() failed to follow this code convention and this is a
problem for future patches that needs to access intel_guc data to verify
the GGTT offset against the GuC WOPCM top.

This patch renames the guc_ggtt_offset to intel_guc_ggtt_offset and updates
the related code to pass intel_guc pointer to this function call, so that
we can have a unified coding style for GuC code and also enable the future
patches to get GuC related data from intel_guc to do the offset
verification. Meanwhile, this patch also moves the GUC_GGTT_TOP from
intel_guc_regs.h to intel_guc.h since it is not GuC register related
definition.

v8:
 - Fixed coding style issues and moved GUC_GGTT_TOP to intel_guc.h (Sagar)
 - Updated commit message to explain to reason and motivation to add
   intel_guc as the first parameter of intel_guc_ggtt_offset (Chris)

v9:
 - Fixed code alignment issue due to line break (Chris)

v10:
 - Removed unnecessary comments, redundant code and avoided reuse variable
   to avoid potential issues (Joonas)

Cc: Michal Wajdeczko 
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble 
Cc: Chris Wilson 
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen 
Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble  (v8)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen  (v9)
Signed-off-by: Jackie Li 
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko  (v11)
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c| 11 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h| 14 --
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_ads.c|  8 
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_ct.c |  5 +++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fw.c |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c|  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_reg.h|  3 ---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c | 10 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c|  6 --
 9 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
index e6512cc..a788e15 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
@@ -269,8 +269,9 @@ void intel_guc_init_params(struct intel_guc *guc)
 
/* If GuC submission is enabled, set up additional parameters here */
if (USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv)) {
-   u32 ads = guc_ggtt_offset(guc->ads_vma) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-   u32 pgs = guc_ggtt_offset(dev_priv->guc.stage_desc_pool);
+   u32 ads = intel_guc_ggtt_offset(guc,
+   guc->ads_vma) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+   u32 pgs = intel_guc_ggtt_offset(guc, guc->stage_desc_pool);
u32 ctx_in_16 = GUC_MAX_STAGE_DESCRIPTORS / 16;
 
params[GUC_CTL_DEBUG] |= ads << GUC_ADS_ADDR_SHIFT;
@@ -418,7 +419,7 @@ int intel_guc_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
data[0] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_ENTER_S_STATE;
/* any value greater than GUC_POWER_D0 */
data[1] = GUC_POWER_D1;
-   data[2] = guc_ggtt_offset(guc->shared_data);
+   data[2] = intel_guc_ggtt_offset(guc, guc->shared_data);
 
return intel_guc_send(guc, data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 }
@@ -441,7 +442,7 @@ int intel_guc_reset_engine(struct intel_guc *guc,
data[3] = 0;
data[4] = 0;
data[5] = guc->execbuf_client->stage_id;
-   data[6] = guc_ggtt_offset(guc->shared_data);
+   data[6] = intel_guc_ggtt_offset(guc, guc->shared_data);
 
return intel_guc_send(guc, data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 }
@@ -463,7 +464,7 @@ int intel_guc_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 
data[0] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_EXIT_S_STATE;
data[1] = GUC_POWER_D0;
-   data[2] = guc_ggtt_offset(guc->shared_data);
+   data[2] = intel_guc_ggtt_offset(guc, guc->shared_data);
 
return intel_guc_send(guc, data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
index 52856a9..0c8b10a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
@@ -100,13 +100,23 @@ static inline void intel_guc_notify(struct intel_guc *guc)
guc->notify(guc);
 }
 
-/*
+/* GuC addresses above GUC_GGTT_TOP also don't map through the GTT */
+#define GUC_GGTT_TOP   0xFEE0
+
+/**
+ * intel_guc_ggtt_offset() - Get and validate the GGTT offset of @vma
+ * @guc: intel_guc structure.
+ * @vma: i915 graphics virtual memory area.
+ *
  * GuC does not allow any gfx GGTT address that falls into range [0, 
WOPCM_TOP),
  * which is reserved for Boot ROM, SRAM and WOPCM. Currently this top address 
is
  * 512K. In order to exclude 0-512K address space from GGTT, all gfx objects
  * used by GuC is pinned with PIN_OFFSET_BIAS along