[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/mtl: C20 state verification

2023-11-09 Thread Mika Kahola
Add state verification for C20 as we have one for C10. V2: Use abstractation of HW readout (Gustavo) Drop MPLLA/B from message for TX and CMN parameters (Gustavo) Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa (v1) Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c | 120

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/mtl: C20 state verification

2023-11-07 Thread Kahola, Mika
> -Original Message- > From: Sousa, Gustavo > Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 2:52 PM > To: Kahola, Mika ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/mtl: C20 state verification > > Quoting Mika Kahola (2023-11-06 05:33:2

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/mtl: C20 state verification

2023-11-07 Thread Gustavo Sousa
Quoting Mika Kahola (2023-11-06 05:33:22-03:00) >Add state verification for C20 as we have one >for C10. > >v2: use register values as u32 instead of u8 > >Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola The patch looks good to me. I had some minor suggestions further down. With those applied, Reviewed-by: Gustavo

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/mtl: C20 state verification

2023-11-06 Thread Mika Kahola
Add state verification for C20 as we have one for C10. v2: use register values as u32 instead of u8 Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c | 107 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.h | 2 +-