Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Fix MST disable sequence

2020-01-13 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 06:40:38PM +, Souza, Jose wrote: > On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 18:20 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 04:09:31PM +, Souza, Jose wrote: > > > On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 16:45 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > > > > > When

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Fix MST disable sequence

2020-01-10 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 18:20 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 04:09:31PM +, Souza, Jose wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 16:45 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > > > When moving the pipe disable & co. function calls from > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Fix MST disable sequence

2020-01-08 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 04:09:31PM +, Souza, Jose wrote: > On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 16:45 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > When moving the pipe disable & co. function calls from > > haswell_crtc_disable() into the encoder .post_disable() hooks I > > neglected to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Fix MST disable sequence

2020-01-08 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 16:45 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > When moving the pipe disable & co. function calls from > haswell_crtc_disable() into the encoder .post_disable() hooks I > neglected to account for the MST vs. DDI interactions properly. > This now leads us to call

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Fix MST disable sequence

2020-01-08 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä When moving the pipe disable & co. function calls from haswell_crtc_disable() into the encoder .post_disable() hooks I neglected to account for the MST vs. DDI interactions properly. This now leads us to call these functions two times for the last MST stream (once from the