On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 02:38:01PM +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 16:04 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 06:08:56PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > > There seems to be a bit of confusing redundancy in a way, how
> > > plane data rate/min
On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 16:04 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 06:08:56PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > There seems to be a bit of confusing redundancy in a way, how
> > plane data rate/min cdclk are calculated.
> > In fact both min cdclk, pixel rate and plane data rate
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 06:08:56PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> There seems to be a bit of confusing redundancy in a way, how
> plane data rate/min cdclk are calculated.
> In fact both min cdclk, pixel rate and plane data rate are all
> part of the same formula as per BSpec.
>
> However
There seems to be a bit of confusing redundancy in a way, how
plane data rate/min cdclk are calculated.
In fact both min cdclk, pixel rate and plane data rate are all
part of the same formula as per BSpec.
However currently we have intel_plane_data_rate, which is used
to calculate plane data rate
