On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, Jani Nikula wrote:
> drm/print: move drm_debug variable to drm_print.[ch]
> drm/print: add drm_debug_enabled()
> drm/etnaviv: use drm_debug_enabled() to check for debug categories
> drm/i2c/sil164: use drm_debug_enabled() to check for debug categories
> drm/msm: use
On Tue, 01 Oct 2019, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2019-10-01 14:03:55 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Sep 2019, Eric Engestrom wrote:
>> > On Tuesday, 2019-09-24 15:58:56 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> >> Hi all, v2 of [1], a little refactoring around drm_debug access to
>> >>
On Tuesday, 2019-10-01 14:03:55 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2019, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 2019-09-24 15:58:56 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> Hi all, v2 of [1], a little refactoring around drm_debug access to
> >> abstract it better. There shouldn't be any functional
On Thu, 26 Sep 2019, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2019-09-24 15:58:56 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Hi all, v2 of [1], a little refactoring around drm_debug access to
>> abstract it better. There shouldn't be any functional changes.
>>
>> I'd appreciate acks for merging the lot via
On Tuesday, 2019-09-24 15:58:56 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Hi all, v2 of [1], a little refactoring around drm_debug access to
> abstract it better. There shouldn't be any functional changes.
>
> I'd appreciate acks for merging the lot via drm-misc. If there are any
> objections to that, we'll
Hi all, v2 of [1], a little refactoring around drm_debug access to
abstract it better. There shouldn't be any functional changes.
I'd appreciate acks for merging the lot via drm-misc. If there are any
objections to that, we'll need to postpone the last patch until
everything has been merged and
