Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/i915: Convert HSW/BDW to use port_mask for DDI probe

2023-06-08 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 05:51:19PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 31 May 2023, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > Make HSW/BDW use port_mask for output probing as well. > > To achieve that the strap checks are moved into > > intel_ddi_init() itself. Or should we move them

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/i915: Convert HSW/BDW to use port_mask for DDI probe

2023-06-02 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 31 May 2023, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Make HSW/BDW use port_mask for output probing as well. > To achieve that the strap checks are moved into > intel_ddi_init() itself. Or should we move them to the > runtime port_mask init instead? Maybe not since the hardware >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/i915: Convert HSW/BDW to use port_mask for DDI probe

2023-05-31 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Make HSW/BDW use port_mask for output probing as well. To achieve that the strap checks are moved into intel_ddi_init() itself. Or should we move them to the runtime port_mask init instead? Maybe not since the hardware is still there, just not connected to anything. v2:

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/i915: Convert HSW/BDW to use port_mask for DDI probe

2023-05-24 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Make HSW/BDW use port_mask for output probing as well. To achieve that the strap checks are moved into intel_ddi_init() itself. Or should we move them to the runtime port_mask init instead? Maybe not since the hardware is still there, just not connected to anything. v2: