On Friday 14 July 2017 07:55 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
Em Sex, 2017-07-14 às 19:25 +0530, Praveen Paneri escreveu:
Hi Paulo,
On Thursday 13 July 2017 02:31 AM, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
Em Sex, 2017-04-28 às 20:07 +0530, Praveen Paneri escreveu:
Now that we have support for Y-tiled buffers, add
Em Sex, 2017-07-14 às 19:25 +0530, Praveen Paneri escreveu:
> Hi Paulo,
>
> On Thursday 13 July 2017 02:31 AM, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > Em Sex, 2017-04-28 às 20:07 +0530, Praveen Paneri escreveu:
> > > Now that we have support for Y-tiled buffers, add another
> > > iteration of tests for Y-tiled
Hi Paulo,
On Thursday 13 July 2017 02:31 AM, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
Em Sex, 2017-04-28 às 20:07 +0530, Praveen Paneri escreveu:
Now that we have support for Y-tiled buffers, add another
iteration of tests for Y-tiled buffers.
Have you tested this on platforms that don't support Y-tiled buffers?
Em Sex, 2017-04-28 às 20:07 +0530, Praveen Paneri escreveu:
> Now that we have support for Y-tiled buffers, add another
> iteration of tests for Y-tiled buffers.
Have you tested this on platforms that don't support Y-tiled buffers? I
don't see a check for that, so I wonder if we'll just fail some
Now that we have support for Y-tiled buffers, add another
iteration of tests for Y-tiled buffers.
Signed-off-by: Praveen Paneri
---
tests/kms_fbc_crc.c | 71 +
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff