Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/5] Command parser batch buffer copy

2014-11-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 02:44:55PM -0800, Volkin, Bradley D wrote: On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 11:19:40AM -0800, Volkin, Bradley D wrote: From: Brad Volkin bradley.d.vol...@intel.com This is v3 of the series I sent here: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2014-July/048705.html

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/5] Command parser batch buffer copy

2014-11-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 11:19:40AM -0800, bradley.d.vol...@intel.com wrote: From: Brad Volkin bradley.d.vol...@intel.com This is v3 of the series I sent here: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2014-July/048705.html Most of the previous commentary still applies. We've fixed

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/5] Command parser batch buffer copy

2014-11-03 Thread bradley . d . volkin
From: Brad Volkin bradley.d.vol...@intel.com This is v3 of the series I sent here: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2014-July/048705.html Most of the previous commentary still applies. We've fixed the secure dispatch regression though, so the series now puts the parser into

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/5] Command parser batch buffer copy

2014-11-03 Thread Volkin, Bradley D
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 11:19:40AM -0800, Volkin, Bradley D wrote: From: Brad Volkin bradley.d.vol...@intel.com This is v3 of the series I sent here: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2014-July/048705.html Most of the previous commentary still applies. We've fixed the secure