On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 04:48:00PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ma, 2016-11-14 at 08:56 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > + static struct lock_class_key __key; \
>
> When lockdep is disabled, this becomes zero size. We might still get
> rid of the #fence strings, with
On ma, 2016-11-14 at 08:56 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Localise the static struct lock_class_key to the caller of
> i915_sw_fence_init() so that we create a lock_class instance for each
> unique sw_fence rather than all sw_fences sharing the same
> lock_class. This eliminate some lockdep false
On 14/11/2016 08:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
Localise the static struct lock_class_key to the caller of
i915_sw_fence_init() so that we create a lock_class instance for each
unique sw_fence rather than all sw_fences sharing the same
lock_class. This eliminate some lockdep false positive when using
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 09:01:00AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 14/11/2016 08:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >Localise the static struct lock_class_key to the caller of
> >i915_sw_fence_init() so that we create a lock_class instance for each
> >unique sw_fence rather than all sw_fences sharing
On 14/11/2016 08:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
Localise the static struct lock_class_key to the caller of
i915_sw_fence_init() so that we create a lock_class instance for each
unique sw_fence rather than all sw_fences sharing the same
lock_class. This eliminate some lockdep false positive when using
Localise the static struct lock_class_key to the caller of
i915_sw_fence_init() so that we create a lock_class instance for each
unique sw_fence rather than all sw_fences sharing the same
lock_class. This eliminate some lockdep false positive when using fences
from within fence callbacks.
