Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/i915: fix VDD state tracking after system resume

2014-08-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 02:56:54PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 02:03:36PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > > Just like during booting the BIOS can leave the VDD bit enabled after > > system resume. So apply the same state sanitization there too. This > > fixes a problem where aft

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/i915: fix VDD state tracking after system resume

2014-08-01 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 02:03:36PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > Just like during booting the BIOS can leave the VDD bit enabled after > system resume. So apply the same state sanitization there too. This > fixes a problem where after resume the port power domain refcount gets > unbalanced. > > v2: >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/i915: fix VDD state tracking after system resume

2014-07-31 Thread Imre Deak
Just like during booting the BIOS can leave the VDD bit enabled after system resume. So apply the same state sanitization there too. This fixes a problem where after resume the port power domain refcount gets unbalanced. v2: - unchanged v3: - call edp sanitizing from the encoder reset handler (Dan