On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 02:40:09PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 03:11:00PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 02:59:59PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > In order to keep the dmabuf alive whilst the mmap is, we need to hold a
> > > reference to the
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 03:11:00PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 02:59:59PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > In order to keep the dmabuf alive whilst the mmap is, we need to hold a
> > reference to the dmabuf and not the backing object. This is important as
> > the dmabuf not
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 02:59:59PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> In order to keep the dmabuf alive whilst the mmap is, we need to hold a
> reference to the dmabuf and not the backing object. This is important as
> the dmabuf not only keeps the object alive, but also the device so that
>
>
In order to keep the dmabuf alive whilst the mmap is, we need to hold a
reference to the dmabuf and not the backing object. This is important as
the dmabuf not only keeps the object alive, but also the device so that
dmabuf = vgem_create_dmabuf();
ptr = mmap(... dmabuf ...);
