On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:03:29AM -0700, Jim Bride wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:25:51PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:48:17AM -0700, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 18:08 -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > > > From: Jim Bride
> > > >
> > >
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:25:51PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:48:17AM -0700, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 18:08 -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > > From: Jim Bride
> > >
> > > Add upfront link training to intel_dp_mst_mode_valid() so that we kn
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:48:17AM -0700, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 18:08 -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > From: Jim Bride
> >
> > Add upfront link training to intel_dp_mst_mode_valid() so that we know
> > topology constraints before we validate the legality of modes to b
On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 18:08 -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> From: Jim Bride
>
> Add upfront link training to intel_dp_mst_mode_valid() so that we know
> topology constraints before we validate the legality of modes to be
> checked.
>
The patch seems to do a lot more things than just what is descr
From: Jim Bride
Add upfront link training to intel_dp_mst_mode_valid() so that we know
topology constraints before we validate the legality of modes to be
checked.
v3:
* Reset the upfront values but dont unset the EDID for MST. (Manasi)
v2:
* Rebased on new revision of link training patch. (Mana