Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul
On Mon, 2023-10-30 at 17:58 +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> Add helpers drivers can use to calculate the BW allocation overhead -
> due to SSC, FEC, DSC and data alignment on symbol cycles - and the
> channel coding efficiency - due to the 8b/10b, 128b/132b encoding. On
>
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 12:28:24AM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 11:31:51PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 05:58:22PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > Add helpers drivers can use to calculate the BW allocation overhead -
> > > due to SSC, FEC, DSC and data
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 11:31:51PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 05:58:22PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > Add helpers drivers can use to calculate the BW allocation overhead -
> > due to SSC, FEC, DSC and data alignment on symbol cycles - and the
> > channel coding efficiency
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 05:58:22PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> Add helpers drivers can use to calculate the BW allocation overhead -
> due to SSC, FEC, DSC and data alignment on symbol cycles - and the
> channel coding efficiency - due to the 8b/10b, 128b/132b encoding. On
> 128b/132b links the FEC
Add helpers drivers can use to calculate the BW allocation overhead -
due to SSC, FEC, DSC and data alignment on symbol cycles - and the
channel coding efficiency - due to the 8b/10b, 128b/132b encoding. On
128b/132b links the FEC overhead is part of the coding efficiency, so
not accounted for in
