On 9/22/2017 2:09 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 19:40:04 +0200, Sagar Arun Kamble
wrote:
On 9/21/2017 11:01 PM, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
On 9/21/2017 2:28 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 19:38:22 +0200, Sagar Arun Kamble
On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 19:40:04 +0200, Sagar Arun Kamble
wrote:
On 9/21/2017 11:01 PM, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
On 9/21/2017 2:28 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 19:38:22 +0200, Sagar Arun Kamble
wrote:
Functionality
On 9/21/2017 11:01 PM, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
On 9/21/2017 2:28 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 19:38:22 +0200, Sagar Arun Kamble
wrote:
Functionality needed to disable GuC interrupts and cleanup the
runtime/relay data structures is already
On 9/21/2017 2:28 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 19:38:22 +0200, Sagar Arun Kamble
wrote:
Functionality needed to disable GuC interrupts and cleanup the
runtime/relay data structures is already covered in the unload path
via intel_guc_fini_hw and
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 19:38:22 +0200, Sagar Arun Kamble
wrote:
Functionality needed to disable GuC interrupts and cleanup the
runtime/relay data structures is already covered in the unload path
via intel_guc_fini_hw and intel_guc_cleanup hence remove
Functionality needed to disable GuC interrupts and cleanup the
runtime/relay data structures is already covered in the unload path
via intel_guc_fini_hw and intel_guc_cleanup hence remove
i915_guc_log_unregister
v2: Removed the function i915_guc_log_unregister.
v3: Rebase as intel_guc.h is