Hi Tvrtko,
> Another option - maybe - is this related to revert of fence error
> propagation? If it is and having that would avoid the need for this invasive
> fix, maybe we unrevert 3761baae908a7b5012be08d70fa553cc2eb82305 with edits
> to limit to special contexts? If doable..
I think that is
Hi Tvrtko,
sorry for the very late reply, it's about time to bring this
patch up.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 12:56:00PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 12/04/2023 12:33, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > Currently, when we perform operations such as clearing or copying
> > large blocks of memory, we
On 13/04/2023 12:56, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 12/04/2023 12:33, Andi Shyti wrote:
Currently, when we perform operations such as clearing or copying
large blocks of memory, we generate multiple requests that are
executed in a chain.
However, if one of these requests fails, we may not realize
On 12/04/2023 12:33, Andi Shyti wrote:
Currently, when we perform operations such as clearing or copying
large blocks of memory, we generate multiple requests that are
executed in a chain.
However, if one of these requests fails, we may not realize it
unless it happens to be the last request
Currently, when we perform operations such as clearing or copying
large blocks of memory, we generate multiple requests that are
executed in a chain.
However, if one of these requests fails, we may not realize it
unless it happens to be the last request in the chain. This is
because errors are