As far as I can tell, most if not all of the below comments
have now been addressed in version 8. Please check to
verify this is correct.
-Jonathan Cavitt
-Original Message-
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Sent: Friday, October 6, 2023 6:05 AM
To: Cavitt, Jonathan ;
On 10/6/2023 09:18, John Harrison wrote:
On 10/6/2023 03:20, Nirmoy Das wrote:
On 10/6/2023 12:11 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Hi,
Andi asked me to summarize what I think is unaddressed review
feedback so far in order to consolidate and enable hopefully things
to move forward. So I will try
On 10/6/2023 03:20, Nirmoy Das wrote:
On 10/6/2023 12:11 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Hi,
Andi asked me to summarize what I think is unaddressed review
feedback so far in order to consolidate and enable hopefully things
to move forward. So I will try to re-iterate the comments and
questions
On 06/10/2023 11:11, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Hi,
Andi asked me to summarize what I think is unaddressed review feedback
so far in order to consolidate and enable hopefully things to move
forward. So I will try to re-iterate the comments and questions below.
But also note that there is a
Hi,
> > + /* Preallocate a shared id for use under memory pressure. */
> > + err = xa_alloc_cyclic_irq(>tlb_lookup, >serial_slot, wait,
> > + xa_limit_32b, >next_seqno, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (err == -ENOMEM) {
> > + kfree(wait);
> > + return
On 10/6/2023 12:11 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Hi,
Andi asked me to summarize what I think is unaddressed review feedback
so far in order to consolidate and enable hopefully things to move
forward. So I will try to re-iterate the comments and questions below.
But also note that there is a
Hi,
Andi asked me to summarize what I think is unaddressed review feedback
so far in order to consolidate and enable hopefully things to move
forward. So I will try to re-iterate the comments and questions below.
But also note that there is a bunch of new valid comments from John
against
On 10/5/2023 12:35, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
From: Prathap Kumar Valsan
The GuC firmware had defined the interface for Translation Look-Aside
Buffer (TLB) invalidation. We should use this interface when
invalidating the engine and GuC TLBs.
Add additional functionality to
From: Prathap Kumar Valsan
The GuC firmware had defined the interface for Translation Look-Aside
Buffer (TLB) invalidation. We should use this interface when
invalidating the engine and GuC TLBs.
Add additional functionality to intel_gt_invalidate_tlb, invalidating
the GuC TLBs and falling back
