Re: [Intel-gfx] [core-for-CI] x86/topology: fix erroneous smp_num_siblings on Intel Hybrid platform

2023-03-28 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 27 Mar 2023, Imre Deak wrote: > From: Zhang Rui > > The SMT siblings value returned by CPUID.1F SMT level EBX differs > among CPUs on Intel Hybrid platforms like AlderLake and MeteorLake. > It returns 2 for Pcore CPUs which have SMT siblings and returns 1 for > Ecore CPUs which do not

Re: [Intel-gfx] [core-for-CI] x86/topology: fix erroneous smp_num_siblings on Intel Hybrid platform

2023-03-27 Thread Saarinen, Jani
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Imre > Deak > Sent: maanantai 27. maaliskuuta 2023 15.11 > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [core-for-CI] x86/topology: fix erroneous > smp_num_siblings on > Intel Hybrid platf

[Intel-gfx] [core-for-CI] x86/topology: fix erroneous smp_num_siblings on Intel Hybrid platform

2023-03-27 Thread Imre Deak
From: Zhang Rui The SMT siblings value returned by CPUID.1F SMT level EBX differs among CPUs on Intel Hybrid platforms like AlderLake and MeteorLake. It returns 2 for Pcore CPUs which have SMT siblings and returns 1 for Ecore CPUs which do not have SMT siblings. Today, the CPU boot code sets