Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915_pm_freq_api: Add a suspend subtest
On Wed, 07 Jun 2023 16:40:53 -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
>
> On 6/7/2023 4:11 PM, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
> >
> > On 6/7/2023 3:56 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> >> On Wed, 07 Jun 2023 15:31:33 -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
> >>> On 6/7/2023 2:12 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 13:35:35 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> Hi Vinay,
>
> > Verify that SLPC API works as expected after a suspend.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar
> > ---
> > tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c | 30 ++
> > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
> > b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
> > index 9005cd220..f35f1f8e0 100644
> > --- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
> > +++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
> > @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@
> > *
> > * SUBTEST: freq-reset
> > * Description: Test basic freq API works after a reset
> > + *
> > + * SUBTEST: freq-suspend
> > + * Description: Test basic freq API works after a runtime suspend
> > */
> >
> > IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test SLPC freq API");
> > @@ -99,6 +102,24 @@ static void test_reset(int i915, int dirfd, int
> > gt)
> > igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> > }
> >
> > +static void test_suspend(int i915, int dirfd, int gt)
> > +{
> > + uint32_t rpn = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RPn_FREQ_MHZ);
> > +
> > + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
> > + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
> > + usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US);
> > + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> > + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> > +
> > + /* Manually trigger a suspend */
> > + igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_S3,
> > + SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
> > +
> > + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> > + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> I am wondering what the purpose/value of this test (and also
> "freq-reset")
> is? How can the "set" min/max set freq (which are just input
> settings)
> change whether or not there is a suspend/resume or a reset? Especially
> when
> we just return cached min/max values from i915?
> >>> It is mainly checking that we don't smother the softlimit during a
> >>> reset or
> >>> suspend flow.
> >> How can softlimit which is a ordinary variable in memory get clobbered
> >> by
> >> suspend resume?
>
> It shouldn't, but funnier things have happened. Anyways, I can add a check
> for cur_freq and ensure that is at min. That will prove we applied the soft
> limit after suspend.
Yes, let's do this. With this at least we will see the min freq being
applied after a resume and should be sufficient reason to merge this.
This test is present for xe in it's present form, but for xe it is reading
shared data (which can be in vram). So it is harder to criticize that it is
just returning a cpu memory variable.
Thanks.
--
Ashutosh
> >>> In addition, it also tests the read/write interface works as expected
> >>> after those events.
> >> There's no write. Sorry, but I'm not convinced. There should be some
> >> more
> >> meat to the test.
> > There are writes in the IGT fixture after the test completes.
> >>
> >> Maybe we can write a test which will check /all/ sysfs values are the
> >> same
> >> after a suspend resume cycle? Why do only these specific ones have to be
> >> checked?
> >
> > This test is specific to the freq api, hence just min/max entries.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Vinay.
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >> --
> >> Ashutosh
> >>
> >>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Vinay.
> >>>
> Thanks.
> --
> Ashutosh
>
>
> > +}
> > +
> > igt_main
> > {
> > int i915 = -1;
> > @@ -143,6 +164,15 @@ igt_main
> > test_reset(i915, dirfd, gt);
> > }
> >
> > + igt_describe("Test basic freq API works after suspend");
> > + igt_subtest_with_dynamic_f("freq-suspend") {
> > + int dirfd, gt;
> > +
> > + for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt)
> > + igt_dynamic_f("gt%u", gt)
> > + test_suspend(i915, dirfd, gt);
> > + }
> > +
> > igt_fixture {
> > int dirfd, gt;
> > /* Restore frequencies */
> > --
> > 2.38.1
> >
Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915_pm_freq_api: Add a suspend subtest
On Wed, 07 Jun 2023 16:40:53 -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
>
>
> On 6/7/2023 4:11 PM, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
> >
> > On 6/7/2023 3:56 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> >> On Wed, 07 Jun 2023 15:31:33 -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
> >>> On 6/7/2023 2:12 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 13:35:35 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> Hi Vinay,
>
> > Verify that SLPC API works as expected after a suspend.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar
> > ---
> > tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c | 30 ++
> > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
> > b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
> > index 9005cd220..f35f1f8e0 100644
> > --- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
> > +++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
> > @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@
> > *
> > * SUBTEST: freq-reset
> > * Description: Test basic freq API works after a reset
> > + *
> > + * SUBTEST: freq-suspend
> > + * Description: Test basic freq API works after a runtime suspend
> > */
> >
> > IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test SLPC freq API");
> > @@ -99,6 +102,24 @@ static void test_reset(int i915, int dirfd, int
> > gt)
> > igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> > }
> >
> > +static void test_suspend(int i915, int dirfd, int gt)
> > +{
> > + uint32_t rpn = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RPn_FREQ_MHZ);
> > +
> > + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
> > + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
> > + usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US);
> > + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> > + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> > +
> > + /* Manually trigger a suspend */
> > + igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_S3,
> > + SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
> > +
> > + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> > + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> I am wondering what the purpose/value of this test (and also
> "freq-reset")
> is? How can the "set" min/max set freq (which are just input
> settings)
> change whether or not there is a suspend/resume or a reset? Especially
> when
> we just return cached min/max values from i915?
> >>> It is mainly checking that we don't smother the softlimit during a
> >>> reset or
> >>> suspend flow.
> >> How can softlimit which is a ordinary variable in memory get clobbered
> >> by
> >> suspend resume?
>
> It shouldn't, but funnier things have happened. Anyways, I can add a check
> for cur_freq and ensure that is at min. That will prove we applied the soft
> limit after suspend.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vinay.
>
> >>
> >>> In addition, it also tests the read/write interface works as expected
> >>> after those events.
> >> There's no write. Sorry, but I'm not convinced. There should be some
> >> more
> >> meat to the test.
> > There are writes in the IGT fixture after the test completes.
This should also be in an exit handler, not in the fixture? See
gem_ctx_freq e.g.
Thanks.
--
Ashutosh
> >>
> >> Maybe we can write a test which will check /all/ sysfs values are the
> >> same
> >> after a suspend resume cycle? Why do only these specific ones have to be
> >> checked?
> >
> > This test is specific to the freq api, hence just min/max entries.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Vinay.
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >> --
> >> Ashutosh
> >>
> >>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Vinay.
> >>>
> Thanks.
> --
> Ashutosh
>
>
> > +}
> > +
> > igt_main
> > {
> > int i915 = -1;
> > @@ -143,6 +164,15 @@ igt_main
> > test_reset(i915, dirfd, gt);
> > }
> >
> > + igt_describe("Test basic freq API works after suspend");
> > + igt_subtest_with_dynamic_f("freq-suspend") {
> > + int dirfd, gt;
> > +
> > + for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt)
> > + igt_dynamic_f("gt%u", gt)
> > + test_suspend(i915, dirfd, gt);
> > + }
> > +
> > igt_fixture {
> > int dirfd, gt;
> > /* Restore frequencies */
> > --
> > 2.38.1
> >
Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915_pm_freq_api: Add a suspend subtest
On 6/7/2023 4:11 PM, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
On 6/7/2023 3:56 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jun 2023 15:31:33 -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
On 6/7/2023 2:12 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 13:35:35 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
Hi Vinay,
Verify that SLPC API works as expected after a suspend.
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar
---
tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c | 30 ++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
index 9005cd220..f35f1f8e0 100644
--- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
+++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@
*
* SUBTEST: freq-reset
* Description: Test basic freq API works after a reset
+ *
+ * SUBTEST: freq-suspend
+ * Description: Test basic freq API works after a runtime suspend
*/
IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test SLPC freq API");
@@ -99,6 +102,24 @@ static void test_reset(int i915, int dirfd,
int gt)
igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
}
+static void test_suspend(int i915, int dirfd, int gt)
+{
+ uint32_t rpn = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RPn_FREQ_MHZ);
+
+ igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
+ igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
+ usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US);
+ igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
+ igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
+
+ /* Manually trigger a suspend */
+ igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_S3,
+ SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
+
+ igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
+ igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
I am wondering what the purpose/value of this test (and also
"freq-reset")
is? How can the "set" min/max set freq (which are just input
settings)
change whether or not there is a suspend/resume or a reset?
Especially when
we just return cached min/max values from i915?
It is mainly checking that we don't smother the softlimit during a
reset or
suspend flow.
How can softlimit which is a ordinary variable in memory get
clobbered by
suspend resume?
It shouldn't, but funnier things have happened. Anyways, I can add a
check for cur_freq and ensure that is at min. That will prove we applied
the soft limit after suspend.
Thanks,
Vinay.
In addition, it also tests the read/write interface works as expected
after those events.
There's no write. Sorry, but I'm not convinced. There should be some
more
meat to the test.
There are writes in the IGT fixture after the test completes.
Maybe we can write a test which will check /all/ sysfs values are the
same
after a suspend resume cycle? Why do only these specific ones have to be
checked?
This test is specific to the freq api, hence just min/max entries.
Thanks,
Vinay.
Thanks.
--
Ashutosh
Thanks,
Vinay.
Thanks.
--
Ashutosh
+}
+
igt_main
{
int i915 = -1;
@@ -143,6 +164,15 @@ igt_main
test_reset(i915, dirfd, gt);
}
+ igt_describe("Test basic freq API works after suspend");
+ igt_subtest_with_dynamic_f("freq-suspend") {
+ int dirfd, gt;
+
+ for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt)
+ igt_dynamic_f("gt%u", gt)
+ test_suspend(i915, dirfd, gt);
+ }
+
igt_fixture {
int dirfd, gt;
/* Restore frequencies */
--
2.38.1
Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915_pm_freq_api: Add a suspend subtest
On 6/7/2023 3:56 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jun 2023 15:31:33 -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
On 6/7/2023 2:12 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 13:35:35 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
Hi Vinay,
Verify that SLPC API works as expected after a suspend.
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar
---
tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c | 30 ++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
index 9005cd220..f35f1f8e0 100644
--- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
+++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@
*
* SUBTEST: freq-reset
* Description: Test basic freq API works after a reset
+ *
+ * SUBTEST: freq-suspend
+ * Description: Test basic freq API works after a runtime suspend
*/
IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test SLPC freq API");
@@ -99,6 +102,24 @@ static void test_reset(int i915, int dirfd, int gt)
igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
}
+static void test_suspend(int i915, int dirfd, int gt)
+{
+ uint32_t rpn = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RPn_FREQ_MHZ);
+
+ igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
+ igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
+ usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US);
+ igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
+ igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
+
+ /* Manually trigger a suspend */
+ igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_S3,
+ SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
+
+ igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
+ igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
I am wondering what the purpose/value of this test (and also "freq-reset")
is? How can the "set" min/max set freq (which are just input settings)
change whether or not there is a suspend/resume or a reset? Especially when
we just return cached min/max values from i915?
It is mainly checking that we don't smother the softlimit during a reset or
suspend flow.
How can softlimit which is a ordinary variable in memory get clobbered by
suspend resume?
In addition, it also tests the read/write interface works as expected
after those events.
There's no write. Sorry, but I'm not convinced. There should be some more
meat to the test.
There are writes in the IGT fixture after the test completes.
Maybe we can write a test which will check /all/ sysfs values are the same
after a suspend resume cycle? Why do only these specific ones have to be
checked?
This test is specific to the freq api, hence just min/max entries.
Thanks,
Vinay.
Thanks.
--
Ashutosh
Thanks,
Vinay.
Thanks.
--
Ashutosh
+}
+
igt_main
{
int i915 = -1;
@@ -143,6 +164,15 @@ igt_main
test_reset(i915, dirfd, gt);
}
+ igt_describe("Test basic freq API works after suspend");
+ igt_subtest_with_dynamic_f("freq-suspend") {
+ int dirfd, gt;
+
+ for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt)
+ igt_dynamic_f("gt%u", gt)
+ test_suspend(i915, dirfd, gt);
+ }
+
igt_fixture {
int dirfd, gt;
/* Restore frequencies */
--
2.38.1
Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915_pm_freq_api: Add a suspend subtest
On Wed, 07 Jun 2023 15:31:33 -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
>
> On 6/7/2023 2:12 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> > On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 13:35:35 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> > Hi Vinay,
> >
> >> Verify that SLPC API works as expected after a suspend.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar
> >> ---
> >> tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c | 30 ++
> >> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
> >> index 9005cd220..f35f1f8e0 100644
> >> --- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
> >> +++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
> >> @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@
> >>*
> >>* SUBTEST: freq-reset
> >>* Description: Test basic freq API works after a reset
> >> + *
> >> + * SUBTEST: freq-suspend
> >> + * Description: Test basic freq API works after a runtime suspend
> >>*/
> >>
> >> IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test SLPC freq API");
> >> @@ -99,6 +102,24 @@ static void test_reset(int i915, int dirfd, int gt)
> >>igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static void test_suspend(int i915, int dirfd, int gt)
> >> +{
> >> + uint32_t rpn = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RPn_FREQ_MHZ);
> >> +
> >> + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
> >> + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
> >> + usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US);
> >> + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> >> + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> >> +
> >> + /* Manually trigger a suspend */
> >> + igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_S3,
> >> +SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
> >> +
> >> + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> >> + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> > I am wondering what the purpose/value of this test (and also "freq-reset")
> > is? How can the "set" min/max set freq (which are just input settings)
> > change whether or not there is a suspend/resume or a reset? Especially when
> > we just return cached min/max values from i915?
>
> It is mainly checking that we don't smother the softlimit during a reset or
> suspend flow.
How can softlimit which is a ordinary variable in memory get clobbered by
suspend resume?
> In addition, it also tests the read/write interface works as expected
> after those events.
There's no write. Sorry, but I'm not convinced. There should be some more
meat to the test.
Maybe we can write a test which will check /all/ sysfs values are the same
after a suspend resume cycle? Why do only these specific ones have to be
checked?
Thanks.
--
Ashutosh
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vinay.
>
> >
> > Thanks.
> > --
> > Ashutosh
> >
> >
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> igt_main
> >> {
> >>int i915 = -1;
> >> @@ -143,6 +164,15 @@ igt_main
> >>test_reset(i915, dirfd, gt);
> >>}
> >>
> >> + igt_describe("Test basic freq API works after suspend");
> >> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic_f("freq-suspend") {
> >> + int dirfd, gt;
> >> +
> >> + for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt)
> >> + igt_dynamic_f("gt%u", gt)
> >> + test_suspend(i915, dirfd, gt);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >>igt_fixture {
> >>int dirfd, gt;
> >>/* Restore frequencies */
> >> --
> >> 2.38.1
> >>
Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915_pm_freq_api: Add a suspend subtest
On 6/7/2023 2:12 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 13:35:35 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
Hi Vinay,
Verify that SLPC API works as expected after a suspend.
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar
---
tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c | 30 ++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
index 9005cd220..f35f1f8e0 100644
--- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
+++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@
*
* SUBTEST: freq-reset
* Description: Test basic freq API works after a reset
+ *
+ * SUBTEST: freq-suspend
+ * Description: Test basic freq API works after a runtime suspend
*/
IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test SLPC freq API");
@@ -99,6 +102,24 @@ static void test_reset(int i915, int dirfd, int gt)
igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
}
+static void test_suspend(int i915, int dirfd, int gt)
+{
+ uint32_t rpn = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RPn_FREQ_MHZ);
+
+ igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
+ igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
+ usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US);
+ igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
+ igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
+
+ /* Manually trigger a suspend */
+ igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_S3,
+ SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
+
+ igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
+ igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
I am wondering what the purpose/value of this test (and also "freq-reset")
is? How can the "set" min/max set freq (which are just input settings)
change whether or not there is a suspend/resume or a reset? Especially when
we just return cached min/max values from i915?
It is mainly checking that we don't smother the softlimit during a reset
or suspend flow. In addition, it also tests the read/write interface
works as expected after those events.
Thanks,
Vinay.
Thanks.
--
Ashutosh
+}
+
igt_main
{
int i915 = -1;
@@ -143,6 +164,15 @@ igt_main
test_reset(i915, dirfd, gt);
}
+ igt_describe("Test basic freq API works after suspend");
+ igt_subtest_with_dynamic_f("freq-suspend") {
+ int dirfd, gt;
+
+ for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt)
+ igt_dynamic_f("gt%u", gt)
+ test_suspend(i915, dirfd, gt);
+ }
+
igt_fixture {
int dirfd, gt;
/* Restore frequencies */
--
2.38.1
Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915_pm_freq_api: Add a suspend subtest
On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 13:35:35 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>
Hi Vinay,
> Verify that SLPC API works as expected after a suspend.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar
> ---
> tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c | 30 ++
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
> index 9005cd220..f35f1f8e0 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@
> *
> * SUBTEST: freq-reset
> * Description: Test basic freq API works after a reset
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: freq-suspend
> + * Description: Test basic freq API works after a runtime suspend
> */
>
> IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test SLPC freq API");
> @@ -99,6 +102,24 @@ static void test_reset(int i915, int dirfd, int gt)
> igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> }
>
> +static void test_suspend(int i915, int dirfd, int gt)
> +{
> + uint32_t rpn = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RPn_FREQ_MHZ);
> +
> + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
> + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
> + usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US);
> + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> +
> + /* Manually trigger a suspend */
> + igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_S3,
> + SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
> +
> + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
I am wondering what the purpose/value of this test (and also "freq-reset")
is? How can the "set" min/max set freq (which are just input settings)
change whether or not there is a suspend/resume or a reset? Especially when
we just return cached min/max values from i915?
Thanks.
--
Ashutosh
> +}
> +
> igt_main
> {
> int i915 = -1;
> @@ -143,6 +164,15 @@ igt_main
> test_reset(i915, dirfd, gt);
> }
>
> + igt_describe("Test basic freq API works after suspend");
> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic_f("freq-suspend") {
> + int dirfd, gt;
> +
> + for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt)
> + igt_dynamic_f("gt%u", gt)
> + test_suspend(i915, dirfd, gt);
> + }
> +
> igt_fixture {
> int dirfd, gt;
> /* Restore frequencies */
> --
> 2.38.1
>
