Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Adding YUV444 packed format support for skl+ (rev3)

2020-02-14 Thread Shankar, Uma


> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx  On Behalf Of 
> Patchwork
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 5:55 AM
> To: Paauwe, Bob J 
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Adding YUV444 packed 
> format
> support for skl+ (rev3)
> 
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: drm/i915: Adding YUV444 packed format support for skl+ (rev3)
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/66770/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7827_full -> Patchwork_16284_full
> 
> 
> Summary
> ---
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_16284_full absolutely need to 
> be
>   verified manually.
> 
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in Patchwork_16284_full, please notify your bug team to allow 
> them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
> 
> 
> Possible new issues
> ---
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> Patchwork_16284_full:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
>  Possible regressions 

Hi Martin/Tomi,
I tried to check these failures locally and they seem to work.

Looks like there was some regression on these tests intermediately (not sure).
They all seem to work on drm-tip with/without the changes.

Can we trigger a re-run just to be sure. Wanted to take permission before 
pressing the button 

Regards,
Uma Shankar

> 
>   * igt@kms_plane@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes:
> - shard-iclb: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] +14 similar issues
>[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7827/shard-
> iclb3/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes.html
>[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16284/shard-
> iclb2/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes.html
> 
>   * igt@kms_plane@pixel-format-pipe-b-planes:
> - shard-skl:  [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] +11 similar issues
>[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7827/shard-
> skl4/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-b-planes.html
>[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16284/shard-
> skl3/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-b-planes.html
> - shard-kbl:  [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6] +13 similar issues
>[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7827/shard-
> kbl2/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-b-planes.html
>[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16284/shard-
> kbl2/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-b-planes.html
> 
>   * igt@kms_plane_scaling@pipe-a-scaler-with-clipping-clamping:
> - shard-glk:  [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8] +13 similar issues
>[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7827/shard-
> glk6/igt@kms_plane_scal...@pipe-a-scaler-with-clipping-clamping.html
>[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16284/shard-
> glk8/igt@kms_plane_scal...@pipe-a-scaler-with-clipping-clamping.html
> 
>   * igt@kms_plane_scaling@pipe-b-scaler-with-pixel-format:
> - shard-apl:  [PASS][9] -> [FAIL][10] +13 similar issues
>[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7827/shard-
> apl1/igt@kms_plane_scal...@pipe-b-scaler-with-pixel-format.html
>[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16284/shard-
> apl7/igt@kms_plane_scal...@pipe-b-scaler-with-pixel-format.html
> 
>   * igt@kms_plane_scaling@pipe-c-scaler-with-rotation:
> - shard-skl:  NOTRUN -> [FAIL][11] +1 similar issue
>[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16284/shard-
> skl2/igt@kms_plane_scal...@pipe-c-scaler-with-rotation.html
> 
>   * igt@kms_plane_scaling@pipe-d-scaler-with-clipping-clamping:
> - shard-tglb: [PASS][12] -> [FAIL][13] +3 similar issues
>[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7827/shard-
> tglb2/igt@kms_plane_scal...@pipe-d-scaler-with-clipping-clamping.html
>[13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16284/shard-
> tglb4/igt@kms_plane_scal...@pipe-d-scaler-with-clipping-clamping.html
> 
> 
> Known issues
> 
> 
>   Here are the changes found in Patchwork_16284_full that come from known 
> issues:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
>  Issues hit 
> 
>   * igt@gem_busy@busy-vcs1:
> - shard-iclb: [PASS][14] -> [SKIP][15] ([fdo#112080]) +14 similar 
> issues
>[14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7827/shard-
> iclb1/igt@gem_b...@busy-vcs1.html
>[15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16284/shard-
> i

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Adding YUV444 packed format support for skl+ (rev3)

2020-01-28 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Adding YUV444 packed format support for skl+ (rev3)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/66770/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7827_full -> Patchwork_16284_full


Summary
---

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_16284_full absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_16284_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  

Possible new issues
---

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
Patchwork_16284_full:

### IGT changes ###

 Possible regressions 

  * igt@kms_plane@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] +14 similar issues
   [1]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7827/shard-iclb3/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes.html
   [2]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16284/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes.html

  * igt@kms_plane@pixel-format-pipe-b-planes:
- shard-skl:  [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] +11 similar issues
   [3]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7827/shard-skl4/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-b-planes.html
   [4]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16284/shard-skl3/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-b-planes.html
- shard-kbl:  [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6] +13 similar issues
   [5]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7827/shard-kbl2/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-b-planes.html
   [6]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16284/shard-kbl2/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-b-planes.html

  * igt@kms_plane_scaling@pipe-a-scaler-with-clipping-clamping:
- shard-glk:  [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8] +13 similar issues
   [7]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7827/shard-glk6/igt@kms_plane_scal...@pipe-a-scaler-with-clipping-clamping.html
   [8]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16284/shard-glk8/igt@kms_plane_scal...@pipe-a-scaler-with-clipping-clamping.html

  * igt@kms_plane_scaling@pipe-b-scaler-with-pixel-format:
- shard-apl:  [PASS][9] -> [FAIL][10] +13 similar issues
   [9]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7827/shard-apl1/igt@kms_plane_scal...@pipe-b-scaler-with-pixel-format.html
   [10]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16284/shard-apl7/igt@kms_plane_scal...@pipe-b-scaler-with-pixel-format.html

  * igt@kms_plane_scaling@pipe-c-scaler-with-rotation:
- shard-skl:  NOTRUN -> [FAIL][11] +1 similar issue
   [11]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16284/shard-skl2/igt@kms_plane_scal...@pipe-c-scaler-with-rotation.html

  * igt@kms_plane_scaling@pipe-d-scaler-with-clipping-clamping:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][12] -> [FAIL][13] +3 similar issues
   [12]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7827/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_plane_scal...@pipe-d-scaler-with-clipping-clamping.html
   [13]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16284/shard-tglb4/igt@kms_plane_scal...@pipe-d-scaler-with-clipping-clamping.html

  
Known issues


  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_16284_full that come from known 
issues:

### IGT changes ###

 Issues hit 

  * igt@gem_busy@busy-vcs1:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][14] -> [SKIP][15] ([fdo#112080]) +14 similar 
issues
   [14]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7827/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_b...@busy-vcs1.html
   [15]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16284/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_b...@busy-vcs1.html

  * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@vcs1-mixed-process:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][16] -> [SKIP][17] ([fdo#109276] / 
[fdo#112080]) +4 similar issues
   [16]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7827/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_ctx_persiste...@vcs1-mixed-process.html
   [17]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16284/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_ctx_persiste...@vcs1-mixed-process.html

  * igt@gem_eio@kms:
- shard-snb:  [PASS][18] -> [INCOMPLETE][19] ([i915#82])
   [18]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7827/shard-snb1/igt@gem_...@kms.html
   [19]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16284/shard-snb5/igt@gem_...@kms.html

  * igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][20] -> [SKIP][21] ([fdo#110854])
   [20]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7827/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_balan...@smoke.html
   [21]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16284/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_exec_balan...@smoke.html

  * igt@gem_exec_schedule@fifo-bsd:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][22] -> [SKIP][23] ([fdo#112146]) +2 similar 
issues
   [22]: