Re: [Intel-gfx] IGT contributions and reviews

2016-10-19 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 07:33:10PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >>> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Petri Latvala wrote: >>> > The current

Re: [Intel-gfx] IGT contributions and reviews

2016-10-19 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Why is Daniel asking me to submit patches to the mailing list if that > guy doesn't seem to need to follow the same rule? Is this some sort of > double- standard?". Not to take anything away from a perfectly good rant, but from

Re: [Intel-gfx] IGT contributions and reviews

2016-10-19 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> > > At the very least I would like to see all commits have a visit to >> > > the >> > > mailing list before pushing, as the current docs already ask for. >> > > The >> > > "right after" part would be changed to a

Re: [Intel-gfx] IGT contributions and reviews

2016-10-19 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Qua, 2016-10-19 às 09:50 +0200, Daniel Vetter escreveu: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 07:33:10PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > > On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Petri Latvala wrote: > > > > > > The current contributing docs for IGT state: > > > > > > << > > >   There is no

Re: [Intel-gfx] IGT contributions and reviews

2016-10-19 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 07:33:10PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Petri Latvala wrote: >> > The current contributing docs for IGT state: >> > >> > << >> > There is no formal review

Re: [Intel-gfx] IGT contributions and reviews

2016-10-19 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 07:33:10PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Petri Latvala wrote: > > The current contributing docs for IGT state: > > > > << > > There is no formal review requirement and regular contributors with > > commit access can push

Re: [Intel-gfx] IGT contributions and reviews

2016-10-18 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Petri Latvala wrote: > The current contributing docs for IGT state: > > << > There is no formal review requirement and regular contributors with > commit access can push patches right after submitting them to the > mailing lists. But invasive

[Intel-gfx] IGT contributions and reviews

2016-10-18 Thread Petri Latvala
The current contributing docs for IGT state: << There is no formal review requirement and regular contributors with commit access can push patches right after submitting them to the mailing lists. But invasive changes, new helper libraries and contributions from newcomers should go