On Wed 08-07-15 09:32:18, Daniel Vetter wrote:
[...]
> Ok that's starting to get nasty. Can you please test what happens when you
> boot with drm.vblankoffdelay=0 and whether drm.vblankoffdelay=1000 has an
> effect on reproduction rate? No debug output needed.
No difference. See the kernel log fro
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 08:40:17AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> I have just tried to boot 4.2-rc1 and cannot seem to reproduce the issue
> anymore.
>
> On Tue 07-07-15 10:43:58, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> [...]
> > Can you please
> > boot with drm.debug=0xf (lots more nois in dmesg with this) and repr
I have just tried to boot 4.2-rc1 and cannot seem to reproduce the issue
anymore.
On Tue 07-07-15 10:43:58, Daniel Vetter wrote:
[...]
> Can you please
> boot with drm.debug=0xf (lots more nois in dmesg with this) and reproduce?
> I only need the last few pages before the WARNING backtrace, just t
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 03:23:39PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> +intel-gfx and Matt
>
> On Wed, 01 Jul 2015, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 01-07-15 10:26:39, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:13:35PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >> > On Tue 30-06-15 18:59:29, Daniel Vetter w
+intel-gfx and Matt
On Wed, 01 Jul 2015, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 01-07-15 10:26:39, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:13:35PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> > On Tue 30-06-15 18:59:29, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> [...]
>> > > Also it might be time to start bisecting this if you c
