Keith,
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 09:34 -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 06:52 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:11:33 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim
sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Matthew's last patch from July 16th applies without modification on top
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:38:34 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim
sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
any update on the merge? I've not seen it anywhere on
It's merged locally; I'm struggling with an SSC bug that's sitting on
top of drm-intel-fixes and needs to either be fixed or reverted. In any
case,
Hi Keith all,
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 15:28 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 21:36:38 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim
sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Since there's no known regression introduced by Matthew's patch, could
it be merged? Feel free to add a
I've had to amend
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:11:33 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim
sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Matthew's last patch from July 16th applies without modification on top
of Linux 3.0 and 3.1-rc1, and applies with some offsets on top of
drm-intel-fixes.
I must have skipped right over it somehow.
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 06:52 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:11:33 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim
sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Matthew's last patch from July 16th applies without modification on top
of Linux 3.0 and 3.1-rc1 [...]
From
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Ali Gholami Rudi aliqr...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 07:53:18 -0700 Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Matthew -- shall I just merge the old patch? Or did you want to make
some changes?
I have a
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 21:36:38 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim
sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Since there's no known regression introduced by Matthew's patch, could
it be merged? Feel free to add a
I've had to amend the patch a bit to get it to apply on top of
drm-intel-fixes; anyone care to
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 15:28 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
I've had to amend the patch a bit to get it to apply on top of
drm-intel-fixes; anyone care to take a look and see if it still looks
reasonable (and/or actually works?)
Hi Keith-
I confirm that this does indeed work (Dell Studio 1558).
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:14:09 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim
sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
FYI, I'm using that on top of Linux 3.0 and 3.1-rc1 and it still works
fine.
Matthew -- shall I just merge the old patch? Or did you want to make
some changes?
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 07:53:18 -0700 Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:14:09 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim
sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
FYI, I'm using that on top of Linux 3.0 and 3.1-rc1 and it still works
fine.
Matthew -- shall I just merge the old
Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 07:53:18 -0700 Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Matthew -- shall I just merge the old patch? Or did you want to make
some changes?
I have a note here that Ali Gholami Rudi aliqr...@gmail.com had issues with
the
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 11:54:22 -0700, Kamal Mostafa ka...@canonical.com wrote:
So what happened to that patch? Did it get lost or is it stuck
somewhere? I humbly ask that it be re-reviewed and pushed upstream.
Afraid it was forgotten -- Matthew, is this patch still useful?
--
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 02:27:46PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 11:54:22 -0700, Kamal Mostafa ka...@canonical.com wrote:
So what happened to that patch? Did it get lost or is it stuck
somewhere? I humbly ask that it be re-reviewed and pushed upstream.
Afraid it was
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 22:31:40 +0100, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
Yup. There's a small set of systems that appear to provide no firmware
control mechanism.
There were a few comments in that old thread about the patch as
submitted; is there an updated version?
--
14 matches
Mail list logo
