Re: [Intel-gfx] port intel-gpu-tools to Wayland

2016-10-13 Thread Daniel Vetter 
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 04:45:34PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> 
> Oh, the list and Petri seem to have been dropped off the distribution,
> adding back. I don't have an answer on the rest. Petri?
> 
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, cornel panceac  wrote:
> > 2016-09-29 14:53 GMT+02:00 Jani Nikula :
> >
> >> On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, cornel panceac  wrote:
> >> > 2016-09-29 14:20 GMT+02:00 Jani Nikula :
> >> >
> >> >> On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, cornel panceac  wrote:
> >> >> > Is this the right mailing list to ask about intel-gpu-tools? I wonder
> >> if
> >> >> > anyone can help me port it to Wayland only, no X11.
> >> >>
> >> >> Please be more specific. Most of it is on top of libdrm, or just messing
> >> >> with the mmio directly, and independent of Wayland or X11.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Looking in the sources, i see this:
> >> >
> >> > $ cat configure.ac | grep -i xorg
> >> > # Require X.Org macros 1.16 or later for XORG_TESTSET_CFLAG
> >> > m4_ifndef([XORG_MACROS_VERSION],
> >> >   [m4_fatal([must install xorg-macros 1.16 or later before
> >> running
> >> > autoconf/autogen])])
> >> > XORG_MACROS_VERSION(1.16)
> >> > XORG_DEFAULT_OPTIONS
> >> > XORG_TESTSET_CFLAG([THREAD_CFLAGS], [-pthread], [-mt])
> >> >
> >> > I would like to change the sources so that xorg is no longer a
> >> requirement.
> >>
> >> On my debian box, dpkg -s xutils-dev says, "Description: X Window System
> >> utility programs for development xutils-dev provides a set of utility
> >> programs shipped with the X Window System that do not require the X
> >> libraries; many of these programs are useful even on a system that does
> >> not have any X clients or X servers installed."
> >>
> >> I'm not sure if that is a real concern. Anything else?
> >>
> >
> > Thank you Jan, i'll try this and provide feedback. One more detail, i'm
> > trying to build it in Yocto, and in our project it complains that x11
> > DISTRO_FEATURE is missing (this is by design). Also, the version is 1.11.

we use x-utils for some of the build-system magic. It shouldn't be a
runtime depency afaik.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] port intel-gpu-tools to Wayland

2016-09-29 Thread Jani Nikula 

Oh, the list and Petri seem to have been dropped off the distribution,
adding back. I don't have an answer on the rest. Petri?

On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, cornel panceac  wrote:
> 2016-09-29 14:53 GMT+02:00 Jani Nikula :
>
>> On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, cornel panceac  wrote:
>> > 2016-09-29 14:20 GMT+02:00 Jani Nikula :
>> >
>> >> On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, cornel panceac  wrote:
>> >> > Is this the right mailing list to ask about intel-gpu-tools? I wonder
>> if
>> >> > anyone can help me port it to Wayland only, no X11.
>> >>
>> >> Please be more specific. Most of it is on top of libdrm, or just messing
>> >> with the mmio directly, and independent of Wayland or X11.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Looking in the sources, i see this:
>> >
>> > $ cat configure.ac | grep -i xorg
>> > # Require X.Org macros 1.16 or later for XORG_TESTSET_CFLAG
>> > m4_ifndef([XORG_MACROS_VERSION],
>> >   [m4_fatal([must install xorg-macros 1.16 or later before
>> running
>> > autoconf/autogen])])
>> > XORG_MACROS_VERSION(1.16)
>> > XORG_DEFAULT_OPTIONS
>> > XORG_TESTSET_CFLAG([THREAD_CFLAGS], [-pthread], [-mt])
>> >
>> > I would like to change the sources so that xorg is no longer a
>> requirement.
>>
>> On my debian box, dpkg -s xutils-dev says, "Description: X Window System
>> utility programs for development xutils-dev provides a set of utility
>> programs shipped with the X Window System that do not require the X
>> libraries; many of these programs are useful even on a system that does
>> not have any X clients or X servers installed."
>>
>> I'm not sure if that is a real concern. Anything else?
>>
>
> Thank you Jan, i'll try this and provide feedback. One more detail, i'm
> trying to build it in Yocto, and in our project it complains that x11
> DISTRO_FEATURE is missing (this is by design). Also, the version is 1.11.
>
> Regards,
> Cornel

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] port intel-gpu-tools to Wayland

2016-09-29 Thread Jani Nikula 
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, cornel panceac  wrote:
> Is this the right mailing list to ask about intel-gpu-tools? I wonder if
> anyone can help me port it to Wayland only, no X11.

Please be more specific. Most of it is on top of libdrm, or just messing
with the mmio directly, and independent of Wayland or X11.

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[Intel-gfx] port intel-gpu-tools to Wayland

2016-09-29 Thread cornel panceac 
Hello,

Is this the right mailing list to ask about intel-gpu-tools? I wonder if
anyone can help me port it to Wayland only, no X11.

Regards,
Cornel
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx