On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 04:57:21PM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 06:40:50PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > Convert all the direct drm_dbg_kms() stuff in intel_crtc_state_dump()
> > over to drm_printf() since we now have the drm_printer around.
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 06:40:50PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Convert all the direct drm_dbg_kms() stuff in intel_crtc_state_dump()
> over to drm_printf() since we now have the drm_printer around.
looking all this I ask myself if it is really a good idea
to move from
From: Ville Syrjälä
Convert all the direct drm_dbg_kms() stuff in intel_crtc_state_dump()
over to drm_printf() since we now have the drm_printer around.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä
---
.../drm/i915/display/intel_crtc_state_dump.c | 185 --
1 file changed, 87 insertions(+),
