Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't try to handle GuC when GuC is not supported.

2016-10-06 Thread Vivi, Rodrigo
On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 09:36 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Em Qua, 2016-10-05 às 23:37 +, Vivi, Rodrigo escreveu: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > So, can we close https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97573 > > with > > wontfix or notabug? > > > > I don't have a strong side on that actually, but

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't try to handle GuC when GuC is not supported.

2016-10-06 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 06 Oct 2016, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Em Qua, 2016-10-05 às 23:37 +, Vivi, Rodrigo escreveu: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> So, can we close https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97573 >> with >> wontfix or notabug? >> >> I don't have a strong side on that actually, but Jani was against it

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't try to handle GuC when GuC is not supported.

2016-10-06 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Qua, 2016-10-05 às 23:37 +, Vivi, Rodrigo escreveu: > Hi Daniel, > > So, can we close https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97573 > with > wontfix or notabug? > > I don't have a strong side on that actually, but Jani was against it > it > seems. Just my opinion: Considering that w

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't try to handle GuC when GuC is not supported.

2016-10-05 Thread Vivi, Rodrigo
Hi Daniel, So, can we close https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97573 with wontfix or notabug? I don't have a strong side on that actually, but Jani was against it it seems. Thanks, Rodrigo. On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 15:50 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 04:55:07PM +0

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't try to handle GuC when GuC is not supported.

2016-10-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 04:55:07PM +, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote: > On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 18:00 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > Em Qua, 2016-09-21 às 11:22 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi escreveu: > > > Avoid any kind of GuC handling if GuC is not supported > > > on a giving platform. > > > > > > Besides being u

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't try to handle GuC when GuC is not supported.

2016-09-22 Thread Vivi, Rodrigo
On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 18:00 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Em Qua, 2016-09-21 às 11:22 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi escreveu: > > Avoid any kind of GuC handling if GuC is not supported > > on a giving platform. > > > > Besides being useless handling, our driver needs > > to be smarter than the user trying to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't try to handle GuC when GuC is not supported.

2016-09-21 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Qua, 2016-09-21 às 11:22 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi escreveu: > Avoid any kind of GuC handling if GuC is not supported > on a giving platform. > > Besides being useless handling, our driver needs > to be smarter than the user trying to use an invalid paramenter. So the problem is when a platform does

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't try to handle GuC when GuC is not supported.

2016-09-21 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Avoid any kind of GuC handling if GuC is not supported on a giving platform. Besides being useless handling, our driver needs to be smarter than the user trying to use an invalid paramenter. Cc: Jani Nikula Cc: Anusha Srivatsa Cc: Christophe Prigent Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_