Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915: Disable runtime-pm using lowlevel functions if !HAS_RC6

2018-08-14 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Chris Wilson writes: > If we cannot setup rc6, we cannot let the GPU suspend itself as it > cannot save its state (to a powercontext). As such, we must disable > runtime-pm, but we should do so using the low-level pm-runtime function > which leaves our own debugging functions intact (and

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915: Disable runtime-pm using lowlevel functions if !HAS_RC6

2018-08-14 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2018-08-14 13:06:45) > Chris Wilson writes: > > > If we cannot setup rc6, we cannot let the GPU suspend itself as it > > cannot save its state (to a powercontext). As such, we must disable > > runtime-pm, but we should do so using the low-level pm-runtime function > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915: Disable runtime-pm using lowlevel functions if !HAS_RC6

2018-08-14 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Chris Wilson writes: > If we cannot setup rc6, we cannot let the GPU suspend itself as it > cannot save its state (to a powercontext). As such, we must disable > runtime-pm, but we should do so using the low-level pm-runtime function > which leaves our own debugging functions intact (and

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915: Disable runtime-pm using lowlevel functions if !HAS_RC6

2018-08-12 Thread Chris Wilson
If we cannot setup rc6, we cannot let the GPU suspend itself as it cannot save its state (to a powercontext). As such, we must disable runtime-pm, but we should do so using the low-level pm-runtime function which leaves our own debugging functions intact (and continue to detect errors in our