On to, 2016-10-20 at 16:03 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> We only used the RPM sequence checking inside the lowlevel GTT
> accessors, when we had to rely on callers taking the wakeref on our
> behalf. Now that we take the RPM wakeref inside the GTT management
> routines themselves, we can forgo the s
We only used the RPM sequence checking inside the lowlevel GTT
accessors, when we had to rely on callers taking the wakeref on our
behalf. Now that we take the RPM wakeref inside the GTT management
routines themselves, we can forgo the sanitycheck of the callers.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
Cc: I
We only used the RPM sequence checking inside the lowlevel GTT
accessors, when we had to rely on callers taking the wakeref on our
behalf. Now that we take the RPM wakeref inside the GTT management
routines themselves, we can forgo the sanitycheck of the callers.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
Cc: I
