Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Recheck breadcrumb seqno after an interrupt

2017-02-16 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:47:41PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 16/02/2017 11:21, Chris Wilson wrote: > >On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:45:56AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > >> > >>On 16/02/2017 10:36, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>>On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:21:17AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Recheck breadcrumb seqno after an interrupt

2017-02-16 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 16/02/2017 11:21, Chris Wilson wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:45:56AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 16/02/2017 10:36, Chris Wilson wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:21:17AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 16/02/2017 09:29, Chris Wilson wrote: If an interrupt arrives whilst we are

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Recheck breadcrumb seqno after an interrupt

2017-02-16 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:19:41AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 16/02/2017 10:50, Chris Wilson wrote: > >On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:45:56AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > >> > >>On 16/02/2017 10:36, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>>On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:21:17AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Recheck breadcrumb seqno after an interrupt

2017-02-16 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:45:56AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 16/02/2017 10:36, Chris Wilson wrote: > >On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:21:17AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > >> > >>On 16/02/2017 09:29, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>>If an interrupt arrives whilst we are performing the irq-seqno

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Recheck breadcrumb seqno after an interrupt

2017-02-16 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 16/02/2017 10:50, Chris Wilson wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:45:56AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 16/02/2017 10:36, Chris Wilson wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:21:17AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 16/02/2017 09:29, Chris Wilson wrote: If an interrupt arrives whilst we are

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Recheck breadcrumb seqno after an interrupt

2017-02-16 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:45:56AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 16/02/2017 10:36, Chris Wilson wrote: > >On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:21:17AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > >> > >>On 16/02/2017 09:29, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>>If an interrupt arrives whilst we are performing the irq-seqno

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Recheck breadcrumb seqno after an interrupt

2017-02-16 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 16/02/2017 10:36, Chris Wilson wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:21:17AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 16/02/2017 09:29, Chris Wilson wrote: If an interrupt arrives whilst we are performing the irq-seqno barrier, recheck the seqno again before returning. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Recheck breadcrumb seqno after an interrupt

2017-02-16 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:21:17AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 16/02/2017 09:29, Chris Wilson wrote: > >If an interrupt arrives whilst we are performing the irq-seqno barrier, > >recheck the seqno again before returning. > > > >Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson > >Cc:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Recheck breadcrumb seqno after an interrupt

2017-02-16 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 16/02/2017 09:29, Chris Wilson wrote: If an interrupt arrives whilst we are performing the irq-seqno barrier, recheck the seqno again before returning. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Recheck breadcrumb seqno after an interrupt

2017-02-16 Thread Chris Wilson
If an interrupt arrives whilst we are performing the irq-seqno barrier, recheck the seqno again before returning. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+),