Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/19] drm/i915: Remove USES_GUC_SUBMISSION() pointer chasing from gen8_cs_irq_handler

2018-05-17 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 17/05/2018 12:24, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-05-17 11:58:21) On 17/05/2018 08:40, Chris Wilson wrote: Store whether or not we need to kick the guc's execlists emulation on the engine itself to avoid chasing the device info. We do not chase device info but modparams

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/19] drm/i915: Remove USES_GUC_SUBMISSION() pointer chasing from gen8_cs_irq_handler

2018-05-17 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-05-17 11:58:21) > > On 17/05/2018 08:40, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Store whether or not we need to kick the guc's execlists emulation on > > the engine itself to avoid chasing the device info. > > We do not chase device info but modparams in this case. > > > gen8_cs_ir

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/19] drm/i915: Remove USES_GUC_SUBMISSION() pointer chasing from gen8_cs_irq_handler

2018-05-17 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 17/05/2018 08:40, Chris Wilson wrote: Store whether or not we need to kick the guc's execlists emulation on the engine itself to avoid chasing the device info. We do not chase device info but modparams in this case. gen8_cs_irq_handler 512 428 -84 I gues

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/19] drm/i915: Remove USES_GUC_SUBMISSION() pointer chasing from gen8_cs_irq_handler

2018-05-17 Thread Chris Wilson
Store whether or not we need to kick the guc's execlists emulation on the engine itself to avoid chasing the device info. gen8_cs_irq_handler 512 428 -84 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 +++- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i