[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Remove i915 ggtt WA since GT E0

2019-08-14 Thread dong . yang
From: "Yang, Dong" Broxton steppings starting from GT E0 have fixed the bug, remove WA since stepping GT E0. v2: use BXT_REVID_D_LAST replace BXT_REVID_D0, by: Joonas Lahtinen Signed-off-by: Yang, Dong --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Remove i915 ggtt WA since GT E0

2019-08-14 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting dong.y...@intel.com (2019-08-14 10:54:05) > From: "Yang, Dong" > > Broxton steppings starting from GT E0 have fixed the bug, remove > WA since stepping GT E0. > > v2: add comment in code, by: > Joonas Lahtinen I didn't suggest any comments, I suggested to change the code. > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Remove i915 ggtt WA since GT E0

2019-08-14 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting dong.y...@intel.com (2019-08-14 08:54:05) > From: "Yang, Dong" > > Broxton steppings starting from GT E0 have fixed the bug, remove > WA since stepping GT E0. If you have a supply of these, could you arrange for one to be put into CI. We have no coverage of bxt-iommu to assess your

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Remove i915 ggtt WA since GT E0

2019-08-14 Thread dong . yang
From: "Yang, Dong" Broxton steppings starting from GT E0 have fixed the bug, remove WA since stepping GT E0. v2: add comment in code, by: Joonas Lahtinen Signed-off-by: Yang, Dong --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git