On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:25:50PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
[SNIP]
> > > + ret = intel_uc_runtime_suspend(dev_priv);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > return intel_guc_runtime_suspend(dev_priv);
> Did you really mean intel_*guc*_runtime_suspend here or was typo?
Typo -
On 9/21/2017 10:16 PM, Michał Winiarski wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:08:19PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
With this patch we disable GuC submission in i915_drm_suspend. This will
destroy the client which will be setup back again. We also reuse the
complete sanitization done via
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:08:19PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
> With this patch we disable GuC submission in i915_drm_suspend. This will
> destroy the client which will be setup back again. We also reuse the
> complete sanitization done via intel_uc_runtime_suspend in this path.
> Post drm
With this patch we disable GuC submission in i915_drm_suspend. This will
destroy the client which will be setup back again. We also reuse the
complete sanitization done via intel_uc_runtime_suspend in this path.
Post drm resume this state is recreated by intel_uc_init_hw hence we need
not have
