Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] GVT-g device model core fixes

2016-10-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 06:13:25PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > Hi, > > This is second pull request for GVT-g sub module which contains > fixes for issues within first pull request. > > Regression test has been passed combining this new pull request > with unmerged driver facilities to test

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] GVT-g device model core fixes

2016-10-20 Thread Zhenyu Wang
Hi, This is second pull request for GVT-g sub module which contains fixes for issues within first pull request. Regression test has been passed combining this new pull request with unmerged driver facilities to test for VMs. Thanks. -- The following changes since commit

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] GVT-g device model core

2016-10-19 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2016.10.19 08:50:21 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:30:30PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > This is first pull request to merge GVT-g device model in i915 > > which contains core GVT-g device model work to virtualize GPU > > resources. This tries to add

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] GVT-g device model core

2016-10-19 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:30:30PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > Hi, > > This is first pull request to merge GVT-g device model in i915 > which contains core GVT-g device model work to virtualize GPU > resources. This tries to add feature of Intel GVT-g technology > for full GPU virtualization.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] GVT-g device model core

2016-10-18 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2016.10.18 14:59:14 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> Ok applied, but a few things to keep in mind before your next pull > >> request: > >> > >> - Dont rebase

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] GVT-g device model core

2016-10-18 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:30:30PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > Hi, > > This is first pull request to merge GVT-g device model in i915 > which contains core GVT-g device model work to virtualize GPU > resources. This tries to add feature of Intel GVT-g technology > for full GPU virtualization.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] GVT-g device model core

2016-10-18 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> Ok applied, but a few things to keep in mind before your next pull >> request: >> >> - Dont rebase everything 5 seconds before sending out the pull request. >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] GVT-g device model core

2016-10-17 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2016.10.17 16:07:50 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Yeah might be best to have a new branch with upstreaming stuff (now you > need to at least split out bugfixes for the already merged stuff) and > treat that like a mostly stable branch. And the still unmerged features > (vfio and all that) would

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] GVT-g device model core

2016-10-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 03:45:47PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > On 2016.10.17 09:33:19 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:30:45AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:30:30PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > This is

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] GVT-g device model core

2016-10-17 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Ok applied, but a few things to keep in mind before your next pull > request: > > - Dont rebase everything 5 seconds before sending out the pull request. > That just invalidates all the testing you've done, so not a good idea. > In

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] GVT-g device model core

2016-10-17 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2016.10.17 09:33:19 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:30:45AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:30:30PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > This is first pull request to merge GVT-g device model in i915 > > > which contains

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] GVT-g device model core

2016-10-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:30:45AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:30:30PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > This is first pull request to merge GVT-g device model in i915 > > which contains core GVT-g device model work to virtualize GPU > > resources. This

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] GVT-g device model core

2016-10-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:30:30PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > Hi, > > This is first pull request to merge GVT-g device model in i915 > which contains core GVT-g device model work to virtualize GPU > resources. This tries to add feature of Intel GVT-g technology > for full GPU virtualization.

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] GVT-g device model core

2016-10-14 Thread Zhenyu Wang
Hi, This is first pull request to merge GVT-g device model in i915 which contains core GVT-g device model work to virtualize GPU resources. This tries to add feature of Intel GVT-g technology for full GPU virtualization. This version will support KVM based virtualization solution named as KVMGT.