On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 06:13:25PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is second pull request for GVT-g sub module which contains
> fixes for issues within first pull request.
>
> Regression test has been passed combining this new pull request
> with unmerged driver facilities to test
Hi,
This is second pull request for GVT-g sub module which contains
fixes for issues within first pull request.
Regression test has been passed combining this new pull request
with unmerged driver facilities to test for VMs.
Thanks.
--
The following changes since commit
On 2016.10.19 08:50:21 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:30:30PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is first pull request to merge GVT-g device model in i915
> > which contains core GVT-g device model work to virtualize GPU
> > resources. This tries to add
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:30:30PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is first pull request to merge GVT-g device model in i915
> which contains core GVT-g device model work to virtualize GPU
> resources. This tries to add feature of Intel GVT-g technology
> for full GPU virtualization.
On 2016.10.18 14:59:14 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> Ok applied, but a few things to keep in mind before your next pull
> >> request:
> >>
> >> - Dont rebase
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:30:30PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is first pull request to merge GVT-g device model in i915
> which contains core GVT-g device model work to virtualize GPU
> resources. This tries to add feature of Intel GVT-g technology
> for full GPU virtualization.
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> Ok applied, but a few things to keep in mind before your next pull
>> request:
>>
>> - Dont rebase everything 5 seconds before sending out the pull request.
>>
On 2016.10.17 16:07:50 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Yeah might be best to have a new branch with upstreaming stuff (now you
> need to at least split out bugfixes for the already merged stuff) and
> treat that like a mostly stable branch. And the still unmerged features
> (vfio and all that) would
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 03:45:47PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> On 2016.10.17 09:33:19 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:30:45AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:30:30PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > This is
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Ok applied, but a few things to keep in mind before your next pull
> request:
>
> - Dont rebase everything 5 seconds before sending out the pull request.
> That just invalidates all the testing you've done, so not a good idea.
> In
On 2016.10.17 09:33:19 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:30:45AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:30:30PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This is first pull request to merge GVT-g device model in i915
> > > which contains
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:30:45AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:30:30PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is first pull request to merge GVT-g device model in i915
> > which contains core GVT-g device model work to virtualize GPU
> > resources. This
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:30:30PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is first pull request to merge GVT-g device model in i915
> which contains core GVT-g device model work to virtualize GPU
> resources. This tries to add feature of Intel GVT-g technology
> for full GPU virtualization.
Hi,
This is first pull request to merge GVT-g device model in i915
which contains core GVT-g device model work to virtualize GPU
resources. This tries to add feature of Intel GVT-g technology
for full GPU virtualization. This version will support KVM based
virtualization solution named as KVMGT.
14 matches
Mail list logo