Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Clear STOP_RING bit on reset

2019-09-10 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2019-09-10 10:54:43) > Chris Wilson writes: > > > Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2019-09-10 10:31:05) > >> Chris Wilson writes: > >> > >> > During reset, we try to ensure no forward progress of the CS prior to > >> > the reset by setting the STOP_RING bit in RING_MI_MODE. Since

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Clear STOP_RING bit on reset

2019-09-10 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Chris Wilson writes: > Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2019-09-10 10:31:05) >> Chris Wilson writes: >> >> > During reset, we try to ensure no forward progress of the CS prior to >> > the reset by setting the STOP_RING bit in RING_MI_MODE. Since gen9, this >> > register is context saved and do we end up

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Clear STOP_RING bit on reset

2019-09-10 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2019-09-10 10:31:05) > Chris Wilson writes: > > > During reset, we try to ensure no forward progress of the CS prior to > > the reset by setting the STOP_RING bit in RING_MI_MODE. Since gen9, this > > register is context saved and do we end up in the odd situation where we

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Clear STOP_RING bit on reset

2019-09-10 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Chris Wilson writes: > During reset, we try to ensure no forward progress of the CS prior to > the reset by setting the STOP_RING bit in RING_MI_MODE. Since gen9, this > register is context saved and do we end up in the odd situation where we > save the STOP_RING bit and so try to stop the