Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/vbt: Assume port A is connected to eDP when there's no VBT

2017-08-10 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 10 Aug 2017, "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" wrote: > On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 05:47 +, Navare, Manasi D wrote: >> We currently assume port A is connected to a DP sink when VBT is absent, >> instead assume it is connected to an eDP sink, which seems like a more

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/vbt: Assume port A is connected to eDP when there's no VBT

2017-08-10 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 05:47 +, Navare, Manasi D wrote: > We currently assume port A is connected to a DP sink when VBT is absent, > instead assume it is connected to an eDP sink, which seems like a more common > configuration. Although I don't have data to back this up, it is still just >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/vbt: Assume port A is connected to eDP when there's no VBT

2017-08-10 Thread Manasi Navare
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 05:56:52PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 10 Aug 2017, "Navare, Manasi D" wrote: > > We currently assume port A is connected to a DP sink when VBT is absent, > > instead assume it is connected to an eDP sink, which seems like a more > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/vbt: Assume port A is connected to eDP when there's no VBT

2017-08-10 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 10 Aug 2017, "Navare, Manasi D" wrote: > We currently assume port A is connected to a DP sink when VBT is absent, > instead assume it is connected to an eDP sink, which seems like a more common > configuration. Although I don't have data to back this up, it is

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/vbt: Assume port A is connected to eDP when there's no VBT

2017-08-10 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 10 Aug 2017, rodrigo.v...@gmail.com wrote: >> On Aug 9, 2017, at 8:20 PM, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: >> >> We currently assume port A is connected to a DP sink when VBT is absent, >> instead assume it is connected to an eDP sink, which seems like a more >> common

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/vbt: Assume port A is connected to eDP when there's no VBT

2017-08-09 Thread Navare, Manasi D
We currently assume port A is connected to a DP sink when VBT is absent, instead assume it is connected to an eDP sink, which seems like a more common configuration. Although I don't have data to back this up, it is still just as valid as asumming port A is not eDP. This reverts to the behavior

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/vbt: Assume port A is connected to eDP when there's no VBT

2017-08-09 Thread rodrigo . vivi
> On Aug 9, 2017, at 8:20 PM, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > We currently assume port A is connected to a DP sink when VBT is absent, > instead assume it is connected to an eDP sink, which seems like a more > common configuration. Although I don't have data to back this up, >