On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:51:42AM +, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 04:20:29AM +, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:14 AM David Weinehall <
> > david.weineh...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 12:50:51PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 04:20:29AM +, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:14 AM David Weinehall <
> david.weineh...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 12:50:51PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > a long time ago I had agreed with Daniel that we would only add new
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:14 AM David Weinehall <
david.weineh...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 12:50:51PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > a long time ago I had agreed with Daniel that we would only add new
> > platforms after it was enabled by default on previous platforms.
>
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 12:50:51PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> a long time ago I had agreed with Daniel that we would only add new
> platforms after it was enabled by default on previous platforms.
> a big reason for that is that we was willing to reduce the platforms
> to validate and do better
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 12:50:51PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> a long time ago I had agreed with Daniel that we would only add new
> platforms after it was enabled by default on previous platforms.
> a big reason for that is that we was willing to reduce the platforms
> to validate and do better
a long time ago I had agreed with Daniel that we would only add new
platforms after it was enabled by default on previous platforms.
a big reason for that is that we was willing to reduce the platforms
to validate and do better validation one by one before enabling.
However now I believe it would