Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Disconnect 32 and 48 bit ppGTT support

2017-08-14 Thread Zhi Wang
Glad to see this happen. :) After this patch landed, some code pieces in i915 which are specifically for disabling dynamic PDP update via LRIs under 32 bit PPGTT could also be removed. For example, gen8_preallocate_top_level_pdp() in i915_gem_gtt.c Thanks, Zhi. On 08/11/17 18:30, Chris

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Disconnect 32 and 48 bit ppGTT support

2017-08-14 Thread Wang, Zhi A
pment <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Disconnect 32 and 48 bit ppGTT support On 2017.08.14 20:34:48 +0800, Zhi Wang wrote: > Looks has_full_48bit_ppgtt is tied to has_full_ppgtt now. Will that be > disconnected also in future? > That's w

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Disconnect 32 and 48 bit ppGTT support

2017-08-14 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2017.08.14 20:34:48 +0800, Zhi Wang wrote: > Looks has_full_48bit_ppgtt is tied to has_full_ppgtt now. Will that be > disconnected also in future? > That's what this is for. So for gvt, we just set has_full_48bit_ppgtt but not has_full_ppgtt. > On 08/11/17 17:51, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Disconnect 32 and 48 bit ppGTT support

2017-08-13 Thread Zhi Wang
Looks has_full_48bit_ppgtt is tied to has_full_ppgtt now. Will that be disconnected also in future? On 08/11/17 17:51, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: Configurations like virtualized environments may support only 48 bit ppGTT without supporting 32 bit ppGTT. Support this by disconnecting the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Disconnect 32 and 48 bit ppGTT support

2017-08-11 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2017-08-11 10:51:26) > Configurations like virtualized environments may support only 48 bit > ppGTT without supporting 32 bit ppGTT. Support this by disconnecting > the relationship of the two feature bits. Did the gvt patches land in dinq? After that, I say we just kill