Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Treat i915_reset_engine() as guilty until proven innocent

2018-04-06 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Michel Thierry (2018-04-06 22:44:34) > On 4/6/2018 2:30 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Michel Thierry (2018-04-06 22:23:21) > >> And I thought we believed in presumption of innocence... > >> > >> On 4/6/2018 2:00 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>> If we are resetting just one engine, we kno

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Treat i915_reset_engine() as guilty until proven innocent

2018-04-06 Thread Michel Thierry
On 4/6/2018 2:30 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Michel Thierry (2018-04-06 22:23:21) And I thought we believed in presumption of innocence... On 4/6/2018 2:00 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: If we are resetting just one engine, we know it has stalled. So we can pass the stalled parameter directly to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Treat i915_reset_engine() as guilty until proven innocent

2018-04-06 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Michel Thierry (2018-04-06 22:23:21) > And I thought we believed in presumption of innocence... > > On 4/6/2018 2:00 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > If we are resetting just one engine, we know it has stalled. So we can > > pass the stalled parameter directly to i915_gem_reset_engine(), which

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Treat i915_reset_engine() as guilty until proven innocent

2018-04-06 Thread Michel Thierry
And I thought we believed in presumption of innocence... On 4/6/2018 2:00 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: If we are resetting just one engine, we know it has stalled. So we can pass the stalled parameter directly to i915_gem_reset_engine(), which alleviates the necessity to poke at the generic engine->h