On Fri, 2017-08-04 at 13:38 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> This is not to try to force a new style; this is my interpretation of
> what the most common existing style is.
>
> With hopes I don't need to answer so many questions about style going
> forward.
>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter
> Signed-off-by: Jani
On Mon, 07 Aug 2017, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> good idea.
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 01:38:36PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>
>>> + *
>>> + * For bit fields, define a _MASK and a _SHIFT macro. Define bit field
>>> contents
>>> + * so that the
On Mon, 07 Aug 2017, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 01:38:36PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> This is not to try to force a new style; this is my interpretation of
>> what the most common existing style is.
>>
>> With hopes I don't need to answer so many questions about style going
good idea.
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 01:38:36PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> This is not to try to force a new style; this is my interpretation of
>> what the most common existing style is.
>>
>> With hopes I don't need to answer so many quest
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 01:38:36PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> This is not to try to force a new style; this is my interpretation of
> what the most common existing style is.
>
> With hopes I don't need to answer so many questions about style going
> forward.
>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter
> Signed-off-b