Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel_chipset: Merge igt chipsets

2013-02-11 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:54:57 -0800 Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net wrote: IGT is newer and arguably better. This change doesn't completely merge the files because it's a bit simpler if we move the I9XX macro over to IGT, and don't move over a few macros from IGT that libdrm doesn't care about.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel_chipset: Merge igt chipsets

2013-02-11 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:54:57 -0800 Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net wrote: IGT is newer and arguably better. This change doesn't completely merge the files because it's a bit simpler if we move the I9XX macro over to IGT, and don't move over a few macros from IGT that libdrm doesn't care about.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel_chipset: Merge igt chipsets

2013-02-11 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 03:05:19PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:54:57 -0800 Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net wrote: IGT is newer and arguably better. This change doesn't completely merge the files because it's a bit simpler if we move the I9XX macro over to IGT, and