Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915/skl: drop pre-production stepping workarounds

2016-09-26 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Paulo Zanoni  wrote:
> Em Sex, 2016-09-16 às 16:59 +0300, Jani Nikula escreveu:
>> Only production steppings are supported, drop workarounds for
>> anything
>> else. The series is split by revision so we can bikeshed if there are
>> steppings some people still need to use for some reason.
>
> Bikeshed: in patches 2 and 3 you could have added platform tags to the
> workaround tags, while also adding the missing space to a
> /* comment*/.
>
> Jani S., Yann: perhaps we could try to check if our CI/QA systems still
> have these machines? Just "lspci -nn | grep VGA" on the SKL systems and
> check whether rev <= 5.
>
> If we conclude our CI system doesn't include these machines:
> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni 

Pushed patches 1-5, thanks for the review, and sent a separate patch to
address the bikesheds [1], along with a resend of your pre-production
hardware warning patch [2].

BR,
Jani.

[1] 
http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1474891672-23414-1-git-send-email-jani.nik...@intel.com
[2] 
http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1474891672-23414-2-git-send-email-jani.nik...@intel.com



>
>> 
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>> 
>> Jani Nikula (5):
>>   drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for A0 and B0 revisions
>>   drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for C0 revision
>>   drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for D0 revision
>>   drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for E0 revision
>>   drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for F0 revision
>> 
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c   |  4 --
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c |  3 --
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c   |  8 ++--
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c  | 23 +--
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c   |  3 +-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c   | 58 +--
>> 
>>  6 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
>> 

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915/skl: drop pre-production stepping workarounds

2016-09-22 Thread Argotti, Yann
> 
> > From: Zanoni, Paulo R
> > Em Sex, 2016-09-16 às 16:59 +0300, Jani Nikula escreveu:
> > > Only production steppings are supported, drop workarounds for
> > > anything else. The series is split by revision so we can bikeshed if
> > > there are steppings some people still need to use for some reason.
> >
> > Bikeshed: in patches 2 and 3 you could have added platform tags to the
> > workaround tags, while also adding the missing space to a
> > /* comment*/.
> >
> > Jani S., Yann: perhaps we could try to check if our CI/QA systems
> > still have these machines? Just "lspci -nn | grep VGA" on the SKL
> > systems and check whether rev <= 5.
> 
> The CI system doesn't have any pre-production SKL machines. They were
> dropped as soon as we got production machines.

On QA side, we have mainly switched to production machines here and remaining 
RVP is > 5.
Yann

> 
> Tomi
> 
> > If we conclude our CI system doesn't include these machines:
> > Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni 
> 
> > > Jani Nikula (5):
> > >   drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for A0 and B0 revisions
> > >   drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for C0 revision
> > >   drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for D0 revision
> > >   drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for E0 revision
> > >   drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for F0 revision
> > >
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c   |  4 --
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c |  3 --
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c   |  8 ++--
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c  | 23 +--
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c   |  3 +-
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c   | 58 +--
> > > 
> > >  6 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915/skl: drop pre-production stepping workarounds

2016-09-22 Thread Sarvela, Tomi P
> From: Zanoni, Paulo R
> Em Sex, 2016-09-16 às 16:59 +0300, Jani Nikula escreveu:
> > Only production steppings are supported, drop workarounds for
> > anything
> > else. The series is split by revision so we can bikeshed if there are
> > steppings some people still need to use for some reason.
> 
> Bikeshed: in patches 2 and 3 you could have added platform tags to the
> workaround tags, while also adding the missing space to a
> /* comment*/.
> 
> Jani S., Yann: perhaps we could try to check if our CI/QA systems still
> have these machines? Just "lspci -nn | grep VGA" on the SKL systems and
> check whether rev <= 5.

The CI system doesn't have any pre-production SKL machines. They were dropped 
as soon as we got production machines.

Tomi

> If we conclude our CI system doesn't include these machines:
> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni 

> > Jani Nikula (5):
> >   drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for A0 and B0 revisions
> >   drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for C0 revision
> >   drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for D0 revision
> >   drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for E0 revision
> >   drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for F0 revision
> >
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c   |  4 --
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c |  3 --
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c   |  8 ++--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c  | 23 +--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c   |  3 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c   | 58 +--
> > 
> >  6 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915/skl: drop pre-production stepping workarounds

2016-09-22 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Sex, 2016-09-16 às 16:59 +0300, Jani Nikula escreveu:
> Only production steppings are supported, drop workarounds for
> anything
> else. The series is split by revision so we can bikeshed if there are
> steppings some people still need to use for some reason.

Bikeshed: in patches 2 and 3 you could have added platform tags to the
workaround tags, while also adding the missing space to a
/* comment*/.

Jani S., Yann: perhaps we could try to check if our CI/QA systems still
have these machines? Just "lspci -nn | grep VGA" on the SKL systems and
check whether rev <= 5.

If we conclude our CI system doesn't include these machines:
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni 

> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> Jani Nikula (5):
>   drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for A0 and B0 revisions
>   drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for C0 revision
>   drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for D0 revision
>   drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for E0 revision
>   drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for F0 revision
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c   |  4 --
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c |  3 --
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c   |  8 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c  | 23 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c   |  3 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c   | 58 +--
> 
>  6 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
> 
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx