Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915: move towards kernel types

2018-06-19 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 2:08 AM Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 09:55:38AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > >> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:15 AM Jani Nikula > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915: move towards kernel types

2018-06-18 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 18 Jun 2018, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > Quoting Jani Nikula (2018-06-15 12:08:23) >> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: >> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 09:55:38AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:15 AM Jani

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915: move towards kernel types

2018-06-18 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Jani Nikula (2018-06-15 12:08:23) > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 09:55:38AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > >> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:15 AM Jani Nikula > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, 12 Jun

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915: move towards kernel types

2018-06-15 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 09:55:38AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:15 AM Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Tvrtko Ursulin >> >> wrote: >> >> > On 12/06/2018

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915: move towards kernel types

2018-06-14 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 09:55:38AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:15 AM Jani Nikula wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > >> > On 12/06/2018 10:19, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> >> Semi-RFC. Do we want to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915: move towards kernel types

2018-06-13 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:15 AM Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: >> > On 12/06/2018 10:19, Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> Semi-RFC. Do we want to do this? Here's a batch of conversions that >> >> shouldn't >> >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915: move towards kernel types

2018-06-12 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:15 AM Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 12/06/2018 10:19, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> Semi-RFC. Do we want to do this? Here's a batch of conversions that > >> shouldn't > >> conflict much with in-flight patches. > >> > >> The trouble

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915: move towards kernel types

2018-06-12 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:19:28PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > Semi-RFC. Do we want to do this? Here's a batch of conversions that shouldn't > conflict much with in-flight patches. > > The trouble with mixed use is that it's inconsistent, and any remaining C99 > types will encourage their use. We

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915: move towards kernel types

2018-06-12 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > On 12/06/2018 10:19, Jani Nikula wrote: >> Semi-RFC. Do we want to do this? Here's a batch of conversions that shouldn't >> conflict much with in-flight patches. >> >> The trouble with mixed use is that it's inconsistent, and any remaining C99 >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915: move towards kernel types

2018-06-12 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 12/06/2018 10:19, Jani Nikula wrote: Semi-RFC. Do we want to do this? Here's a batch of conversions that shouldn't conflict much with in-flight patches. The trouble with mixed use is that it's inconsistent, and any remaining C99 types will encourage their use. We could at least do the low