Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/66] drm/i915/gem: Remove the call for no-evict i915_vma_pin

2020-07-31 Thread Intel
On 7/28/20 5:05 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Thomas Hellström (Intel) (2020-07-28 10:46:51) On 7/15/20 1:50 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: Remove the stub i915_vma_pin() used for incrementally pining objects for s/pining/pinning/ Pining for the fjords. -Chris Apart from that, Reviewed-by:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/66] drm/i915/gem: Remove the call for no-evict i915_vma_pin

2020-07-28 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Thomas Hellström (Intel) (2020-07-28 10:46:51) > > On 7/15/20 1:50 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Remove the stub i915_vma_pin() used for incrementally pining objects for > > s/pining/pinning/ Pining for the fjords. -Chris ___ Intel-gfx mailing

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/66] drm/i915/gem: Remove the call for no-evict i915_vma_pin

2020-07-28 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-07-17 15:36:04) > > On 15/07/2020 12:50, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Remove the stub i915_vma_pin() used for incrementally pining objects for > > execbuf (under the severe restriction that they must not wait on a > > resource as we may have already pinned it) and replace

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/66] drm/i915/gem: Remove the call for no-evict i915_vma_pin

2020-07-28 Thread Intel
On 7/15/20 1:50 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: Remove the stub i915_vma_pin() used for incrementally pining objects for s/pining/pinning/ ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/66] drm/i915/gem: Remove the call for no-evict i915_vma_pin

2020-07-17 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 15/07/2020 12:50, Chris Wilson wrote: Remove the stub i915_vma_pin() used for incrementally pining objects for execbuf (under the severe restriction that they must not wait on a resource as we may have already pinned it) and replace it with a i915_vma_pin_inplace() that is only allowed to